Laserfiche WebLink
I Councilmember Ranallo reported several residents, upon noting the City's <br />new entrance sign, had called him to tell him the fact that the <br />lettering for "St. Anthony Village" had confused them. He said <br />4 their comments were to the effect that the Council had told them not too <br />5 long ago that St. Anthony was required by statute to be referred to as <br />6 the "City of St. Anthony" and now, you're telling us its' OK to call it <br />7 "St. Anthony Village"." Mr. Soth told him if the change was made, all <br />8 official documentation statutorily had to be identified as from the <br />9 "City of St. Anthony Village" but it might be possible to refer to the <br />10 community as "Village" in other situations without changing the <br />11 letterheads, etc. When Councilmember Enrooth indicated he wouldn't be <br />12 interested in making the change if it would cost the City or the <br />13 residents too much to do so, the City Attorney said he didn't think the <br />14 change would be too difficult or expensive but he would check it out <br />15 with the Minnesota Department of State and report his findings back to <br />16 the Council as soon as he could. <br />17 There was concurrence that having two cities in Minnesota with the same <br />18 name is very confusing at times and Mayor Sundland pointed to the fact <br />19 that 67% of the community had responded to the recent survey by <br />20 indicating they chose to be identified as from "St. Anthony Village." <br />21 PUBLIC HEARING <br />22 Gross Golf Course and Sunset Memorial Cemetery Spokespersons Object to <br />23 Having to Pay for Reconstruction of St. Anthony Boulevard <br />At 8:02 P.M., the Mayor opened the public hearing on the $112,850.95 the <br />25 City proposes assessing against abutting properties for the <br />26 reconstruction St. Anthony Boulevard between the Burlington Northern <br />27 Railroad bridge and the south City limit line. He referred to the <br />28 Notice of Hearing which had been mailed to the abutting property owners <br />29 and published in the Bulletin and Resolution 88-047 with which the <br />30 Council would be adopting special assessments against the only two <br />31 properties which abut St. Anthony Boulevard in the subject, Gross Golf <br />32 Course and Sunset Memorial Cemetery. <br />33 Staff ReRgrt <br />34 Mr. Childs told the representatives of those two properties that under <br />35 the City Assessment Policy the Council had adopted in February, 1986, <br />36 the amounts they were being assessed included the costs of: <br />37 *a 5 ton roadway thickness, even though a 9 ton roadway had been <br />38 constructed with the difference between a 5 and 9 ton design being <br />39 paid for by the City; <br />40 *an 8 foot traffic lane next to their properties needed for ingress <br />41 and egress with the cost to reconstruct the middle of the road being <br />42 paid by the City for the use of the general public; <br />43 curb and gutters for which they would have to pay 100%. <br />