My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 12131988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1988
>
CC MINUTES 12131988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 9:12:10 AM
Creation date
8/20/2014 7:04:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/13/1988
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I Councilmember Ranallo reported several residents, upon noting the City's <br />new entrance sign, had called him to tell him the fact that the <br />lettering for "St. Anthony Village" had confused them. He said <br />4 their comments were to the effect that the Council had told them not too <br />5 long ago that St. Anthony was required by statute to be referred to as <br />6 the "City of St. Anthony" and now, you're telling us its' OK to call it <br />7 "St. Anthony Village"." Mr. Soth told him if the change was made, all <br />8 official documentation statutorily had to be identified as from the <br />9 "City of St. Anthony Village" but it might be possible to refer to the <br />10 community as "Village" in other situations without changing the <br />11 letterheads, etc. When Councilmember Enrooth indicated he wouldn't be <br />12 interested in making the change if it would cost the City or the <br />13 residents too much to do so, the City Attorney said he didn't think the <br />14 change would be too difficult or expensive but he would check it out <br />15 with the Minnesota Department of State and report his findings back to <br />16 the Council as soon as he could. <br />17 There was concurrence that having two cities in Minnesota with the same <br />18 name is very confusing at times and Mayor Sundland pointed to the fact <br />19 that 67% of the community had responded to the recent survey by <br />20 indicating they chose to be identified as from "St. Anthony Village." <br />21 PUBLIC HEARING <br />22 Gross Golf Course and Sunset Memorial Cemetery Spokespersons Object to <br />23 Having to Pay for Reconstruction of St. Anthony Boulevard <br />At 8:02 P.M., the Mayor opened the public hearing on the $112,850.95 the <br />25 City proposes assessing against abutting properties for the <br />26 reconstruction St. Anthony Boulevard between the Burlington Northern <br />27 Railroad bridge and the south City limit line. He referred to the <br />28 Notice of Hearing which had been mailed to the abutting property owners <br />29 and published in the Bulletin and Resolution 88-047 with which the <br />30 Council would be adopting special assessments against the only two <br />31 properties which abut St. Anthony Boulevard in the subject, Gross Golf <br />32 Course and Sunset Memorial Cemetery. <br />33 Staff ReRgrt <br />34 Mr. Childs told the representatives of those two properties that under <br />35 the City Assessment Policy the Council had adopted in February, 1986, <br />36 the amounts they were being assessed included the costs of: <br />37 *a 5 ton roadway thickness, even though a 9 ton roadway had been <br />38 constructed with the difference between a 5 and 9 ton design being <br />39 paid for by the City; <br />40 *an 8 foot traffic lane next to their properties needed for ingress <br />41 and egress with the cost to reconstruct the middle of the road being <br />42 paid by the City for the use of the general public; <br />43 curb and gutters for which they would have to pay 100%. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.