My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12092014
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2014
>
CC PACKET 12092014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 7:04:15 AM
Creation date
3/16/2015 11:52:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/9/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 25, 2014 <br />Page 5 <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />The Applicant 's existing home is a legal non-conforming structure according to the Zoning Ordinance, <br />which leaves no alternative but to obtain a variance for any addition (expansion) to the structure. Given <br />the setbacks in the existing ordinance, the Applicant can add onto the home toward the rear property <br />line and still meet the rear yard setback, but the side yard setback is the constraining factor. The <br />Applicant's desire to improve their property by constructing a first story and basement addition to <br />increase the living space for their family is reasonable, especially since the home was constructed in <br />1965 and the spatial needs of a family have changed over the past 50 years . <br />However, staff questions the need for an addition that continues the approximately 7-foot side yard <br />setback further eastward. There appear to be reasonable alternatives to the proposed configuration <br />that would bring the north -face of the addition into compliance with the side yard setback (even though <br />the rest of the home is non-confirming as it exists today). <br />Staff recognizes that any addition to the existing home will require a variance given the fact that the <br />existing home is a legal non -conforming structure . Staff also acknowledges that an addition to increase <br />the living space of this home is reasonable. However, it is not clear that the extent of the variance <br />requested (an additional 23 feet of building length along the existing non-conforming north side <br />setback) is necessary to accomplish the Applicant's goal. There is a practical difficulty demonstrated by <br />the fact that the lot was platted, and a home was constructed, in a manner that cannot be improved <br />(enlarged) in any manner without the issuance of a variance . <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />1. Request Additional Information and Continue the Meeting. It appears that the Applicant has <br />provided all of the required information for the City Council 's evaluation. Should the City <br />Council request additional information from the Applicant, the City Council should continue the <br />meeting until a later time. <br />2 . Approval (with or without conditions) of the Variances. In the event of a decision for approval <br />(with or without conditions), the City Council may refer to Exhibit C and may modify the draft <br />resolution for approval to i nclude any conditions that it deems necessary . <br />3. Denial of the Variance. In the event the City Council chooses denial of the requested variances, <br />it should clearly state its reasons for the denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution . <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />Exhibit A: <br />Exhibit B: <br />Exh ibit C: <br />Location map <br />Application and Supporting Material <br />Resolution 14-087; a resolution Approving a Variance from the Required Front and Side <br />Yard Setbacks in Order to Construct a First Story and Basement Addition 7.1 feet from <br />the Property Line Along the North Side of the Property located at 3635 Chelmsford <br />Road. <br />93
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.