Laserfiche WebLink
applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. She stated the applicant has 1 <br />not met the criteria that the plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the 2 <br />property because the reason for the request is to expand the garage and is not due to any 3 <br />factors outside their control. She stated the variance if granted will not alter the essential 4 <br />character of the locality and is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood; economic 5 <br />considerations alone are not the basis for the variance; the variance if granted would be 6 <br />consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and granting of the variance is in harmony with the 7 <br />general purpose and intent of the Code. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Chairperson Crone opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Ms. Erin Burns, 2832 Coolidge St. NE, stated there are three other two-car garages near her 12 <br />property with a 1’ setback and they are not significantly increasing their footprint. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Commissioner Poucher expressed concern about the proximity of the garage to the neighbors 15 <br />and the possibility of fire spreading quickly. 16 <br /> 17 <br />City Planner Rothstein stated the City’s building official would examine the site to determine 18 <br />if a fire wall is needed due to the proximity to other garages. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Chairperson Crone closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Motion by Commissioner Gondorchin, seconded by Commissioner Papatola, to recommend 23 <br />that the City Council approve the request for a variance from the required side and rear yard 24 <br />setback to construct a detached garage on the property located at 2832 Coolidge St. NE. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Motion carried 5-0. 27 <br /> 28 <br />D. Consider code text amendment to Section 152.187 of City Code to allow for solar 29 <br />energy systems on residential structures, and provide standards for such 30 <br />installations. 31 <br /> 32 <br />City Planner Rothstein presented the proposed Code text amendment to allow for greater 33 <br />applications of solar energy systems and noted this is the first major revision of the Code to 34 <br />expand the applicability and use of solar energy systems. She advised the purpose of the 35 <br />amendment is to incorporate more detailed standards governing the installation of solar 36 <br />energy s ystems, to provide clarity for City staff, solar installers, and property owners, to set 37 <br />standards for building mounted and freestanding systems, and to clarify that solar access 38 <br />easements may be purchased from nearby property owners. She stated the proposed 39 <br />Ordinance requires flush mounted systems in the front yards of homes and on all accessory 40 <br />structures and freestanding solar systems are allowed in all zoning districts but only in the rear 41 <br />yard. She stated solar energy systems would be a permitted use in residential districts and a 42 <br />conditional use in commercial districts and the systems cannot be more than 10’ high. She 43 <br />stated that light poles can have solar and all light pole-mounted solar installations are allowed 44 <br />through the issuance of a CUP and limited to three square feet. 45 <br /> 46 <br />4