My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12082015
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2015
>
CC PACKET 12082015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2015 4:32:20 PM
Creation date
12/8/2015 4:12:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/8/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />10 River Park Plaza St. Paul, MN 55107 www.comcastcorporation.com <br /> <br /> <br />VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL <br />December 4, 2015 <br />Mayor Jerry Faust <br />City of St. Anthony <br />3301 Silver Lake Road <br />St. Anthony, MN 55418 <br />Dear Mayor Faust: <br />I am writing to provide Comcast’s comments regarding the CenturyLink Cable TV Franchise <br />Ordinance that was presented for a First Reading at the November 10, 2015, City Council <br />Meeting (“Summary” and “Proposed Franchise”). Thank you in advance for considering this <br />input. As we have stated previously and in the public record in front of the North Suburban <br />Cable Communications Commission (see attached), Comcast welcomes robust competition and <br />we do not oppose the granting of an equitable cable franchise to Qwest Broadband Services or <br />its d/b/a, CenturyLink. <br />Comcast is however concerned with the competitive inequities created by some of the <br />obligations in the proposed CenturyLink franchise that are materially different from the <br />obligations in Comcast’s current franchise with the City. As you are aware from the Summary, <br />Minnesota Statute 238.08, subd. 1(b) requires that the City cannot grant an additional franchise <br />with “terms and conditions more favorable or less burdensome than those in the existing <br />franchise pertaining to (1) the area served…” Furthermore, the FCC expressly allows buildout <br />requirements in franchise agreements so long as they are “reasonable.” 1 <br />Section 2(7) of CenturyLink’s proposed franchise requires that CenturyLink build to only 15% of <br />the City. The supporting documents, however, contains no discussion of what may be a <br />reasonable requirement for [X] or why CenturyLink’s proposal, that fails to address 85% of its <br />citizens, meets this standard. “Less burdensome” certainly requires more than what <br />CenturyLink has offered. And while Section 2(7) of the proposed franchise requires that “a <br />significant number of households below the medium income of the city” it offers no instruction <br />as where CenturyLink must build and no clear way to ensure CenturyLink meets that standard. <br /> <br />1 Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable <br />Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Order on Reconsideration, at para.7 (rel. Jan 21, <br />2015).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.