My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HRA MINUTES 05282003
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
HRA Minutes
>
2003
>
HRA MINUTES 05282003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 9:20:15 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 9:20:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/28/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes <br />May 28, 2003 <br />• Page 3 <br />1 Motion by Commissioner Thuesen to adopt H.R.A. Resolution 03-008 re: authorize purchase of <br />2 3505 Silver Lake Road and H.R.A. Resolution 03-009 re: authorize purchase of 3501 Silver Lake <br />3 Road. <br />4 <br />5 Discussion: <br />6 Commissioner Sparks asked if the City had liability if further contamination was detected. City <br />7 Attorney Jerome Gilligan responded that once the site evaluation had been performed the City <br />8 could move forward. Chair Hodson stated that a successful Phase 1 review had been completed <br />9 on the property. <br />10 <br />11 Jeff Oertel, Oertel Architects, came forward and stated that Braun Intertec had been on the site <br />12 last week. Each person involved in the Phase 1 review was comfortable with the results, and <br />13 they did not feel Phase 2 was necessary. Mr. Oertel proceeded to explain procedures used and <br />14 results obtained. He stated all borings came up clean. There was only evidence of minor spills. <br />15 However, he did recommend that a "Response Action Plan" be prepared in case something <br />16 should arise during construction. He restated that all those involved were comfortable with the <br />17 results. <br />18 <br />19 Commissioner Faust stated that the only reason to go beyond Phase I would be if something <br />20 were found. Mr. Oertel said that was correct. <br />9 Commissioner Horst stated that one of the concerns was that the soil was not strong enough on <br />23 that site to hold the fire station. He questioned what had been done to address the possible need <br />24 for a buildup. Mr. Oertel responded that it had been ascertained that the bearing capacity would <br />25 be 2000 psi, which would be adequate. He said the top layers of the soil were mostly sandy clay, <br />26 primarily dense. He added that there was only a minor concern regarding one comer of the site; <br />27 however, building was not planned there. <br />28 <br />29 Commissioner Horst stated that the footprints looked like some land excavation and building up <br />30 would be required. Mr. Oertel responded that some would be needed. More would be known <br />31 when a survey was received. It was advised that if more fill were needed, fill material would be <br />32 available in the next month or two. <br />33 <br />34 Commissioner Thuesen asked if not as much soil was moved when in a situation where there was <br />35 a question of contaminated soil. Mr. Oertel responded that, if contaminated material were found, <br />36 the best plan would be to get rid of it. He added that there were two or three different ways of <br />37 handling it. <br />38 <br />39 Commissioner Thuesen asked if a plan was needed to deal with potential psi issues. Mr. Oertel <br />40 stated that the soils were very easily managed. The only real concern would be if there were oil <br />41 leaks from any of the tanks or something was hidden that had not been found by the soil borings. <br />6 Motion carried unanimously. <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.