My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HRA MINUTES 11301999
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
HRA Minutes
>
1999
>
HRA MINUTES 11301999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 10:50:01 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:50:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/30/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes <br />November 30, 1999 <br />• Page 4 <br />I Cavanaugh asked if there was proof that the $12.00 per square foot was a reasonable figure. Ir <br />2 other words, could a paper trail be provided for the H.R.A. to review. Mr. Krier stated that the <br />3 property could be appraised, but that process would take approximately six weeks. <br />4 Mr. Krier clarified Item No. 3 on the revised draft by stating that the purchase of 8,500 square <br />5 feet from the Shopping Center owners (Republic Investment) x $12.00 per square foot is the <br />6 dollar figure for the purchase of the easement. From that figure, 90% would be utilized by <br />7 Republic Investment for redevelopment of the village green area. <br />8 Cavanaugh inquired about the cost of maintenance of the village green area. Mr. Krier clarified <br />9 that the City would be responsible for maintaining the area. <br />10 Mr. Soth questioned Item No. 6 on the revised draft, which stated that the City would attempt to <br />11 obtain an easement from the adjacent apartments and The Hitching Post to extend the village <br />12 green to Kenzie Terrace. Mr. Soth wished to clarify for the H.R.A. that it is unlikely that <br />13 Housing and Urban Development (HUD) would approve the sale. <br />14 Cavanaugh clarified that if the City decided not to proceed with this project, then the TIF funds <br />from the Kenzie District would be used to pay down bonds, and the project would have to con - <br />10 tinue with utilizing the TIF funds from Chandler. <br />17 Faust reiterated his concern about the bottom line number regarding the total purchase price of <br />18 the Shopping Center easement. <br />19 Mr. Krier stated that the bottom line is that the City is attempting to utilize an opportunity to ac - <br />20 quire the land, and if it is determined that the project is not viable, then the City would receive <br />21 back 90% of the investment. <br />22 Faust stated that he would appreciate receiving a bottom line figure that the easement would cost. <br />23 Mr. Krier stated that the cost would be approximately $135,000, because there would be addi- <br />24 tional costs of putting together the project. <br />25 The second cost, Mr. Krier stated, would be the improvements on the land, which have been es - <br />26 timated at approximately $1,200,000. Mr. Krier felt that the figure of $1.2 million was excessive <br />27 and that the project could be completed satisfactorily for approximately $700,000 to $800,000. <br />28 Morrison offered insight by stating that the City has the option to keep the momentum going on <br />29 the project, and use some of the TIF funds from the Kenzie District, and then in January or <br />February use some of the funds in the Chandler TIF account for improvements. Or, the other op- <br />tion, Morrison stated, is to slow the project down, lose the opportunity to utilize funds from the <br />32 Kenzie TIF account, and return to the project in the Year 2000 and arrange financing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.