My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HRA MINUTES 11301999
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
HRA Minutes
>
1999
>
HRA MINUTES 11301999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 10:50:01 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 10:50:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/30/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes <br />November 30, 1999 <br />• Page 5 <br />I Thuesen questioned if the City would be bound to the figure of $12.00 per square foot if it agreed <br />2 to the revised draft. <br />3 Mr. Krier explained that of the $12.00 per square foot, 90% of that amount would be invested <br />4 into improvements for the village green, or returned to the City if the project was abandoned. <br />5 Marks expressed his belief that it was important to keep the energy going strong on this project. <br />6 He stated he understands that there have been obstacles that make the project awkward and those <br />7 obstacles tend to push the H.R.A. to make a decision in an uncomfortable fashion. However, <br />8 Marks felt that the H.R.A. should proceed with the momentum on the project. <br />9 Thuesen agreed with Marks and confirmed that the H.R.A. is on a fast track with this project. <br />10 Nonetheless, the project has slowed down because the City would only be using a portion of the <br />I I Kenzie TIF funds, and then in the Year 2000 would be reviewing the larger costs. By approving <br />12 the revised Letter of Understanding, Thuesen said, the City is staying on track with the project. <br />13 The important fact, he stated, is Item No. 14 on the Letter of Understanding which would allow <br />14 the City to abandon the project. Thuesen felt that the H.R.A.. should remain cautious with <br />15 reference to the project, but should continue to proceed. <br />4kCavanaugh stated he felt it would be irresponsible of the H.R.A. to approve a project that is not <br />17 specifically set forth on paper. <br />18 Faust agreed and stated he is personally not satisfied with the amount of detail that has been pro - <br />19 vided that would allow the H.R.A. to approve certain aspects of the project. Faust wished to <br />20 state that he fully supported the concept of the project; however, he would like for City.Attomey <br />21 Soth to review the agreement and have more detail provided as well. He stated that the issue at <br />22 hand is the H.R.A. needs to provide due diligence to the citizens of the City. <br />23 Marks asked Mr. Krier about the possibility of returning to the H.R.A. at the December 16, 1999 <br />24 meeting with all documentation, particularly a financial plan, so that all concerns would be satis- <br />25 fied. <br />26 Ranallo confirmed that the City needed to give the City Staff, City Attorneys, and developers a <br />27 clear sense of what the City is expecting. Ranallo reminded the H.R.A. that at the previous <br />28 meeting, he had asked if the City Attorney had reviewed the proposals. <br />29 City Attorney Soth made a recommendation that instead of executing the Letter of Understand - <br />30 ing, that the City direct Staff to proceed with the preparation of a Developers Agreement <br />31 incorporating the terms suggested. In essence, the City would not be agreeing to any terms at <br />this point, and would be able to review a Developers Agreement at the next meeting on <br />December 16, 1999. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.