PL PACKET 01252016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 3. Recommend Denial of the Amendment to the Existing Conditional Use Permit. In the event 2 the Planning Commission chooses denial of the requested Amendment to the existing 3 Conditional Use Permit, it should clearly state its reasons for the denial recommendation and 4 direct staff to prepare a resolution. 5 6 Commissioner Papatola asked if the same footprint would be used for the new business as was 7 for the existing Buster’s business. City Planner Rothstein stated it will be the same. 8 9 Commissioner Foster asked what the other uses are on the site and their hours of operation. He is 10 concerned whether there will be adequate parking. Ms. Rothstein stated the parking variance was 11 approved and is still in place. All the uses are the same and include another restaurant and a 12 daycare center. 13 14 Commissioner Gondorchin asked if the notice to the neighbors was the same as for Buster’s. Ms. 15 Rothstein stated the geographic notification area was the same, however an updated owner list 16 was used. Commiss ioner Gondorchin asked if the CUP was tied to the owner rather than the 17 property and Ms. Rothstein stated it is tied to the owner. Commissioner Gondorchin questioned 18 if Friday and Saturday nights were considered the weekend in the hours listing and Ms. Rothstein 19 stated they are considered the weekend. Ms. Rothstein stated the liquor license is tied to the 20 applicant rather that the property and the hours are tied to the CUP. One of the requests is to 21 adjust the CUP with the modified hours requested. Commissioner Gondorchin asked what the 22 timeline was for the landscaping. Ms. Rothstein stated the landscaping does not have a deadline 23 because staff felt an escrow would be a more effective way of ensuring the landscaping gets 24 done. Ms. Rothstein suggested if the Commission wants to put a date on the landscaping that an 25 installation deadline be added. 26 27 Mr. Lorenzo Tejeda, Mr. Paul Marshall and Mr. David Maceda appeared before the 28 Commission. Mr. Lorenzo Tejeda no ted they have another location C atrinas in Oakdale. That 29 location was opened a year ago and is doing very well. They specialize in fresh Mexican food. 30 The three of them ha ve many years of experience in the restaurant business. At their other 31 location, beer sales are not high but some people like to have a beer or wine with Mexican food. 32 They will be a good neighbor for the community. They fully understand and are willing to 33 comply with the CUP. Mr. Paul Marshall confirmed they only sell beer, not wine, and it 34 amounts to 10% of their total sales. They have never had any problems with serving beer. They 35 have 10 employees and it is a small business. 36 37 Commissioner Bartel asked why there is a difference between the hours at the Oakdale location 38 and the proposed hours for the St. Anthony location. Mr. Lorenzo Tejeda stated they are now 39 able to accommodate more hours since they have the process in place. 40 41 Commissioner Gondorchin a sked what time on Sundays would the restaura nt open and Mr. 42 Lorenzo Tejeda stated it would open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 10:00 p.m. 43 44 4 4