CC PACKET 04252000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 64 April 18, 2000 Page 9 • Bergstrom responded that since Hillcrest is unsure about the particular development of the outlots for the future, it would be an excellent idea to incorporate language to cover all aspects. Mornson agreed that the City should consider all of the property that Hillcrest owns when devel- oping the PUD. Additionally, Momson stated that if Hillcrest were at some point to relinquish the property back to US Bank, the potential for subdivision of the property would be an issue. Mr. Gleekel addressed the Commission and explained the process that Hillcrest Development would be starting and the issues that would be addressed in the application. Mr. Tankenoff addressed the Commission and stated that his goal as coordinator of the process is to determine and consider the concerns that the residents around Silver Lake have, as well as work with Rice Creek about stormwater runoff. Mr. Tankenoff reconfirmed that an introductory meeting had been held with the Silver Lake Homeowners Association and he anticipated continued meetings. He wondered if there were other neighborhoods or associations that had concerns and, if so, he would be prepared to meet with them as well. • Bergstrom acknowledged that Mr. Tankenoff has done an excellent job of due diligence and in- forming the residents, City Council, Planning Commission and the community of the progress with the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. Bergstrom thanked both Mr. Tankenoff and Mr. Gleekel for their attendance at the meeting as in- put to the Commission. VI. POSTPONED APPLICATION. None. VII. REPORTS,PRESENTATIONS,AND/OR CONCEPT REVIEWS. None VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS. None. IX. COMMISSION INPUT. Tillmann expressed support for the PUD process. Additionally, she stated that she felt the meet- ing with the City Council held at 5:30 p.m. that day was beneficial and she would encourage more meetings to promote excellent communication. •