CC PACKET 04252000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

63 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 18, 2000 Page 8 • Additionally, Mr. Carlson would recommend to City Staff that an agreement be drafted in a form similar to one that has been presented to the Commission. In other words, an agreement that de- picts rezoning to a set of drawings specific to a certain project. He proceeded to review certain terms and conditions that he would recommend be incorporated into the agreement. Bergstrom mentioned that the City has incorporated a park dedication ordinance for residential zotiing districts. To the extent that a residential section would be allowed within the . contemplated PUD, he inquired if the 10% park dedication ordinance would be in effect. Mr. Carlson responded that it would depend upon the specific wording for the PUD, but would be worthwhile to investigate the possibility further. Mr. Carlson stated that he would coordinate with City Manager Michael Mornson and Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom to arrive at a satisfactory park dedication figure. Additionally, Momson offered that the City would need to define a certain area for the Metro- politan Council to review. Mornson suggested that the Planning Commission incorporate a minimum lot size as a consideration for the PUD, as well as potential language regarding park dedication requirements. • Regarding a development review committee, Mornson requested that Mr. Carlson inform him of the members of the committee. Mr. Carlson suggested members of the Planning Commission, plus City Staff, but would confirm that suggestion with Mornson upon further inquiry. Hanson confirmed that a developers agreement would be entered into if the City Council approved the PUD. Thomas confirmed that the PUD would allow for Hillcrest to begin the redevelopment of the Apache Plaza, but would continue to allow the City to obtain public input on how the rest of the property would be developed. Mr. Carlson responded that the PUD could be phrased as strict or as lenient as the City deemed appropriate. Mr. Jones stated his belief the importance of viewing the entire parcel as a PUD. Bergstrom asked DSU and City Staff to work together to arrive at a reasonable minimum stan- dard. Hanson expressed his impression that the purpose of the PUD would be to allow Hillcrest to de- velop inside a box, so to speak, but that the City would have input regarding the development of • the outlots in the future. He expressed his belief that such language should be incorporated into the PUD or developers agreement.