My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 11221988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 11221988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:33:39 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:33:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 11221988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> 1 *told Commissioner Brownell that if the variance weren't granted, he <br /> 2 would have to construct the garage substantially shorter and would <br /> 3 probably not be able to house his cars because the non-conforming <br /> 4 garage, which was there before, had apparently been grandfathered in to <br /> 5 the current City Ordinance; <br /> 6 *told Commissioner Madden the roadbed at that point is almost 33 feet <br /> 7 across and there's about 16-1/2 feet on either side of the right-of-way <br /> 8 and the Commissioner's calculations that the distance from the edge of <br /> 9 the bituminous might be 29-1/2 feet rather than the 31 feet he had <br /> 10 calculated were probably correct. <br /> 11 Neighbor Asks Questions <br /> 12 Andrew Szurek whose home at 2809 Silver Lane was identified as the <br /> 13 first property east of the subject property and whose signed indication <br /> 14 that he had no objections to the proposed addition had been included in <br /> 15 the agenda packet; <br /> 16 *wanted to know how-Mr. Hance's garage would line up with Mr. Solie's <br /> 17 on the west side and whether the City would inspect- the -project before. <br /> 18 the garage was constructed; <br /> 19 *indicated Mr. Hance was coming in with some "surprises" about which <br /> 20 he said he had talked to the lawyer before the meeting, including the <br /> 21 fact that the structure would be built three feet higher than he had <br /> 22 first anticipated, which caused him some concern about drainage; <br /> 23 *said he was concerned that the adjoining land might be landscaped <br /> 24 higher than his property where the land between the two parcels had <br /> 25 been level before and he would like to see assurances in writing that <br /> 26 it wouldn't create a drainage problem for him. <br /> 27 Mr. Hance addressed what he said he perceived were two concerns - of Mr. <br /> 28 Szurek, drainage and access to his property. He said he and the <br /> 29 Building Inspector, Larry Hamer, had both assured that adequate <br /> 30 provisions for drainage would be made when the Hance lot is raised to <br /> 31 street level, leaving Mr. Szurek's lot lower. The applicant told the <br /> 32 Commissioners that the swales which are now only primitively constructed <br /> 33 on both sides of his property would ultimately be finished to guarantee <br /> 34 no drainage on either neighbors' properties, which, of course, would <br /> 35 also be a City requirement. - - <br /> 36 Mr. Hance said the other issue which bothered Mr. Szurek was how the <br /> 37 Hance driveway would be constructed, which the attorney said was still <br /> 38 not resolved. He explained that four of the homes had 10 foot easements <br /> 39 along side the parallel to Silver Lane, but on their own respective <br /> 40 properties, which had served as a sort of service road. Although his <br /> 41 driveway wouldn't encroach on any of his neighbors' easements, Mr. Hance <br /> 42 said he wanted to get that eliminated but hadn't quite worked out the <br /> 43 agreements which would provide egress and ingress to their lots. He <br /> 44 said he was trying to negotiate an agreement with the Szurek's whereby <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.