My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 04112000
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000
>
CC PACKET 04112000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:13:02 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:12:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 04112000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
93 <br /> DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP <br /> • <br /> Michael J. Morrison <br /> March 1, 2000 <br /> Page t <br /> moved, except to change it-to a conforming use." As I understand it,the sign is being altered, but it is <br /> not being enlarged, extended, replaced or moved. It is not clear whether the sign is being <br /> "reconstructed". If the City concludes that it is not being"reconstructed", it could be deemed to be <br /> permitted under Section 1660.02, Subd. 1. If this is not clear, however,the City could always <br /> consider a variance. If this is done,the issue would be whether it would constitute a hardship to <br /> relocate the sign to move it off the right-of-way. <br /> Whether the City determines that a variance is needed or not, if the sign will continue to be <br /> located.in the right-of-way,I would recommend that an agreement be entered into with the church in a <br /> form similar to that which I prepared for the Hobart Swan property, to provide the church with a <br /> license to continue the sign in the City right-of-way under certain conditions. This would make it clear <br /> that the City would have the right to require the church to move the sign if it deemed that it was a safety <br /> hazard or if it otherwise was in the City's best interest to have the sign moved for widening of the road, . <br /> snow storage, etc. In such an agreement,we can provide that the church would indemnify the City for <br /> any claims related to the presence of the sign in the right-of-way as we did with respect to the Hobart <br /> Swan property. <br /> I hope this answers the questions you had,but if you have any further questions, please let me <br /> know. <br /> Very truly your , <br /> 4 <br /> William R. Soth <br /> WRS/ms <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.