My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 11171987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 11171987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:36:18 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 11171987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 announced that as -of- that date. the sprinkling .ban -had -bee.n_ lifted. ., <br /> 2 for' St. Anthony and a message to that effect had .been posted.:,. on. <br /> 3 the Kiwanis- announcement.'board. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Makowske indicated she would like to have the joint .meeting of <br /> 6 the Council and School Board the following evening .replace this <br /> 7 message for the next day since although -there would probably be no <br /> 8 decisions -made, the meeting is..open to the public, many of whom <br /> 9 have expressed a real interestiin. hearing what both sides have to <br /> 10 say regarding the future use of the Parkview building. <br /> 11 Enrooth agreed, saying,- aithough this would not .. be a public. hear- <br /> -12 ing where public input would be sought and the facilitator would <br /> 13 keep the discussions on the subject, the effort should be made to <br /> 14 let the residents know what is happening; <br /> 15 said he perceived that even though a consensus might not be <br /> 16 arrived at during the meeting, at least -both sides. would have <br /> 17 gotten a sense of direct-ion for subsequent negotiations. <br /> 18 Sundland indicated that at least he expected after both sides had <br /> 19 stated their positions and the City had reported just how much it <br /> 20 would cost to move all City services into Parkview, the School <br /> 21 Board would offer some options for making that move feasible; <br /> •22 said he intended- to go with an open mind' to hear what the School <br /> 23 Board had to offer . <br /> 24 Marks commented- that he had found quite interesting the way <br /> 25 those negotiations had evolved from an offer which he thought had <br /> 26 been more than reasonable at the first., followed .by an offer. that <br /> 27 ' was not nearly as good before the City had even had a chance to <br /> 28 come to grips with the initial proposal; <br /> 29 said what the school is advocating now could almost be' seen as a <br /> 30 "non-offer. " <br /> 31 Enrooth said his understanding was that whatever the School Dis- <br /> 32 trict gets from the property cannot, under state statute, be <br /> 33 utilized in terms of spendable capital as the school wants , but <br /> 34 can only be used for debt reduction or go to the state. <br /> 35 Childs_ indicated that was what the Council had been told initi- <br /> 36 ally but he wasn'-t certain that was how the school' s new Finance <br /> 37 Officer perceived the issue. <br /> 38 Makowske jokingly said she thought the Council should go . to the <br /> 39 meeting with "open- minds but not holes in their -heads" . <br /> 40 *Metro-, .Council Seeks City Input In Process for Revising Their <br /> 41 Transportation Policy Plan <br /> 5 <br /> i� 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.