My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 09191995
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1995
>
PL PACKET 09191995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:30:43 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1995
SP Name
PL PACKET 09191995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION 71 <br /> The forecasted year 2000 average daily traffic developed through the above described <br /> procedures are shown on Map 9. Actual 1986 traffic counts are shown on Map 8. It should <br /> be mentioned that the forecasted traffic volumes were assigned to the road network assuming <br /> unimpeded flow capacity. In reality as one travel route approaches congestion, drivers begin <br /> to use alternate routes which may be less direct. In other words, shifting of some of the <br /> traffic from one route to alternate routes will occur if the desired route lacks adequate <br /> capacity. This is an important factor which must be considered in interpreting the forecasted <br /> volumes. <br /> TRAFFIC CARRYING CAPACITY <br /> Once the quantity of travel demand for the year 2000 has been determined the roadway <br /> system must be evaluated to determine its ability to handle the forecast travel demand, not <br /> only in terms of quantity, but also in terms of service afforded. <br /> Quality of service is apparent to the road user in terms of his freedom to follow a path <br /> and speed of his own choosing, the ease, and the physical and mental comfort of his driving <br /> task. Quality of service also affects his safety, convenience and vehicle operating costs. <br /> "Level of Service" is a term devised by traffic experts to provide a qualitative measure <br /> of traffic related to various volume (quantity) conditions. "Level of Service" is identified by <br /> letter designations A through P to of increasing travel demand and decreasing quality of <br /> service. <br /> Levels of service are defined for two basically different operating conditions: <br /> Uninterrupted traffic flow as experienced on freeways and rural <br /> highways without traffic signals or STOP signs. <br /> Interrupted flow as experienced on urban arterials where the <br /> controlling factor is the ability of signalized intersections to handle <br /> travel demand. <br /> 1. Uninterrupted Flow — Level of service A through F for uninterrupted flow is defined <br /> as follows: <br /> Level of service A is the highest quality. It is a condition of free flow in <br /> which there is little or no restriction on speed or maneuverability. <br /> Level of service B is stable flow, but operating speeds may be affected by <br /> the presence of other traffic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.