My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05162000
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2000
>
PL PACKET 05162000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:36:38 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 05162000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
44 <br /> Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> April 10, 2000 <br /> • Page 3 _ <br /> 1 Mr. Hubmer stated that,through the public hearing process and prior neighborhood meetings, he <br /> 2 has been made aware of residents' concerns regarding lighting at Silver Point Park. In this re- <br /> 3 spect., Mr. Hubmer stated that once the Commission has arrived at a lighting plan, a <br /> 4 neighborhood meeting would be held and the plan would be presented to the residents. Mr. <br /> 5 Hubmer elaborated that the height of the lights as well as the lighting schedule would be of <br /> 6 particular concern to the residents. <br /> 7 Jindra inquired about the intensity of the lights, and Mr. Hubmer responded that the intensity <br /> 8 would vary. A light-intensity study would be performed, he stated. Jindra asked if the lights <br /> 9 could be focused more directly on the fields to alleviate possible annoyances to the residents. <br /> 10 Mr. Hubmer responded that option could be considered, but potentially could increase the cost of <br /> 11 the total lighting system. <br /> 12 Jindra asked Mr. Hubmer for his opinion on the tentative date in May for the grand opening of <br /> 13 Silver Point Park. Mr. Hubmer stated that the park could be opened in May,but it would hinge <br /> 14 on the understanding that reseeding would most likely be done in the fall. Various discussion en- <br /> 15 sued amongst the Commissioners about the optimal date for the opening of the park in order to <br /> 16 allow the grass to take hold. <br /> •? An official grand opening date of June 1, 2000 was discussed, with the option of allowing <br /> younger children to utilize the fields after May 1. Jindra reminded the Commission that the next <br /> 19 meeting would be held on Monday, May 8, and details surrounding the grand opening would <br /> 20 need to be addressed. <br /> 21 Jindra thanked Mr. Hubmer and stated that the Commission is looking forward to discussing in <br /> 22 detail additional issues at the May 8, 2000 meeting. <br /> 23 VI. ' ' DISCUSS CENTRAUPARK REDEVELOPMENT. <br /> 24 Chair Jindra invited Bob Kost, BRW, Inc.,to address the Commission regarding the Central Park <br /> 25 redevelopment project. Mr. Kost presented the site survey of the Park to the Commission, and <br /> 26 stated that the survey is 95%complete and he is awaiting additional information for the <br /> 27 completion of the survey. <br /> 28 In short, Mr. Kost expressed disappointment that there is less ground that originally anticipated. <br /> 29 Initially, Mr. Kost stated that there was believed to be approximately 1,022 feet from the edge of <br /> 30 the trail, and in reality,the survey indicated there was 990 feet. <br /> 31 Chair Jindra introduced Mr. Gary Palm. the Athletic Director for the High School,who was in <br /> 32 attendance at the meeting. Mr. Kost presented.a sketch of the proposed redevelopment of Central <br /> 33 Park and reviewed the specifics of the drawing with the Commission and Mr.Palm. In <br /> �4 particular,Mr. Kost pointed out the location and sizes of the fields,potential grading that would <br /> 5 be needed, the possible sloping of the land for water runoff, and the potential for a variety of uses <br /> 36 for the fields. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.