My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 07212001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2001
>
PL PACKET 07212001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:38:58 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:38:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 07212001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> July 9, 2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1 pavilion. Ms. Olivier then presented two plan alternates (Scheme A and Scheme B) and <br /> 2 explained the differences in each. <br /> 3 Ms. Skrivseth asked about the capacity of the meeting rooms. Ms. Olivier noted there is one <br /> 4 meeting room and the other space is the warming house. <br /> 5 Ms. Olivier noted the east and west elevations of Scheme B presents a more symmetrical roof <br /> 6 than Scheme A. She advised that the windows have been reduced in size, but are still the same <br /> 7 length and contain casement-style windows. In addition, the building is air conditioned. She <br /> 8 noted the "fluff' has been removed from the restrooms and mechanical rooms. <br /> 9 Mr. Anderson asked if the fireplace is to be included in Scheme A. Ms. Olivier stated it should <br /> 10 be included. She noted the difference between the two schemes is about $6,000. <br /> 11 Commissioners Zurbey stated his support for Scheme B which provides a better design, use of <br /> 12 space, and outside appearance. <br /> 13 Mr. Anderson stated he finds these revisions to have removed the extravagance without <br /> 14 compromising use or appearance of the building. <br /> 15 Ms. Olivier advised of the interior construction details, truss design, exterior treatments of the <br /> 16 upper roof area, and building materials. She noted that a scissor truss design could be used to <br /> 17 save more money. <br /> 18 Mr. Anderson asked about the cost between the different truss designs and noted that for <br /> 19 continuity, it may be desirable to have the same interior, roof design, and ceiling of the picnic <br /> 20 pavilion. Discussion occurred regarding how the roof will appear with scissor trusses. <br /> 21 Ms. Olivier answered questions of the Commission regarding partition type and costs. <br /> 22 Commissioner Jenson asked if the warming house can be open year-round. Mr. Anderson stated <br /> 23 it depends on how the space is intended to be used. He noted that the room may be used by the <br /> 24 boy scouts for ten of the twelve months. <br /> 25 Consensus was reached to use a scissor truss design to maintain continuity. Ms. Olivier stated <br /> 26 she will get more information on how the mechanical partition wall track can be constructed. <br /> 27 Discussion occurred regarding who would be responsible to open/close the mechanical partition. <br /> 28 Mr. Anderson stated discussion will be needed between the City and Community Services on <br /> 29 building management. He encouraged the City and Community Services to raise the rental rates <br /> 30 high enough to be able to afford a part-time attendant who can clean the facility after each use. <br /> 31 Councilmember Hodson agreed with the comment about the design but, in view of the cost issue, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.