Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br /> August- 14,_19.90. <br /> page 5 <br /> • 1 C. Calgon Carbon Corporation <br /> 2 Motion by Makowske, second by Wagner to approve payment in the amount <br /> 3 of 53,348.00 to Calgon Carbon Corporation for the temporary granular <br /> 4 activated .carbo.n system through July 31 , 1990• <br /> 5 <br /> G Motion carried unanimously <br /> 7 <br /> 8 D. Mark Vogel <br /> 9 Motion by Ranallo, second by Marks to authorize payment in the amount <br /> 10 of $1 ,042.03 to Mark Vogel , 4070 Foss Road N.E. , less any monies due <br /> 11 the City. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 From 1986 through 1989 Mr. Vogel had misread his water meter on several <br /> 14 occasions. Adjustments had been made since 1986 by the utility billing <br /> 15 clerk but these adjustments had ceased in the third quarter of 1988. <br /> 16 Since that time no adjustments had been made and when the move-out <br /> 17 reading was done the overpayments were realized. The City Manager <br /> 18 indicated to the Council that when the final reading is conducted <br /> 19 there may be less owing to Mr. Vogel than the amount stated in the <br /> 20 agenda. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 23 <br /> Y4 E. Verified <br /> 25 Motion by Marks, second by Ranallo to approve payment of the Liquor <br /> • 26 Accounts Payable dated July 30, 1990 and the Accounts Payable dated <br /> 27 August 1.5, 1990• <br /> 28 <br /> �9 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 30 <br /> 31 F. Rieke Carroll Muller Associates <br /> 32 The amount being requested for payment is $816.47 for professional <br /> 33 services rendered from May 27, 1990 to June 30, 1990• <br /> 34 <br /> 35 This firm had been requested to have a representative attend this <br /> 36 Council meeting to review its invoicing to date and give a status <br /> 37 report on the modification of Well House k3• Mr. Charles Barger <br /> 38 was in attendance at this meeting for this purpose. Mr. Barger is <br /> 39 an engineer for Rieke Carroll Muller Associates and is familiar <br /> 40 with the project. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Mr. Barger advised the Council of some of the reasons for the increases <br /> 43 over the original estimated costs. He observed that the initial request <br /> 44 his firm received was for an engineering proposal based on bringing <br /> 45 the exisitng electrical service at Well #3 up to code and an evaluation <br /> 46 of the electrical service to the water treatment facilities. He noted <br /> 47 that the contract with the City is based on a salary cost times a <br /> 48 factor with a not-to-exceed number without further Council authori- <br /> 49 zation. It was acknowledged that the firm should have advised the <br /> 50 Council earlier that the cost estimates were not accurate and authorization <br />