Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes L� <br /> May 28, 2003 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Mr. Hubmer stated that a meeting had been held on April 29, 2003, to discuss financing <br /> 2 alternatives and street lighting improvements for St. Anthony Boulevard. Four alternatives for <br /> 3 financing the improvements were discussed with the residents. The residents preferred the <br /> 4 financing plan that included 50% of the lighting costs assessed to the individual property owners <br /> 5 and the remaining 50% of the cost paid for by the City of St. Anthony Street Improvement <br /> 6 Funds. The assessment would be applied to each property on their water and sewer utility bill. <br /> 7 They would be billed four times a year for the assessment principle, plus an interest rate equal <br /> 8 the rate for the City's street assessments for a period of 10 years. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Councilmember Horst asked what the catalyst was that created the need for lighting <br /> 11 improvement. Mr. Hubmer responded that the catalyst was a meeting put together by residents <br /> 12 to discuss the lighting. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Councilmember Horst asked what the process would be if other residents wished to have this <br /> 15 done on their street. Mr. Hubmer responded that discussion had been opened up regarding the <br /> 16 type of lighting for all the residents in the City and the type of financing available. <br /> 17 Councilmember Horst asked if money was available. Mr. Hubmer responded that there probably <br /> 18 was not money available at this time. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Councilmember Horst indicated that the only issue that had been brought to him was that the <br /> 21 50% is money that all the taxpayers will be paying. Mr. Hubmer responded that the bonds would <br /> 22 be paid out of the general fund. Councilmember Horst stated that he was trying to understand <br /> 23 how this cost would benefit the other residents. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Councilmember Thuesen responded that this should not be seen as a project for the residents of <br /> 26 St. Anthony Boulevard; it should be seen as benefiting all residents. Other residents in the City <br /> 27 would benefit from the lighting as they drive or walk through the area. Councilmember Thuesen <br /> 28 felt the entire Village would benefit. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Councilmember Horst stated he did not disagree that it is important the sidewalks have good <br /> 31 lighting. He asked if a precedent was being set. Mayor Hodson responded that a special fund <br /> 32 had been discussed and was being initiated that addresses consistent lighting for the walking <br /> 33 community. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Mr. Hubmer stated that the funding mechanism for the present issue was the State Aid Fund. He <br /> 36 added that the State Aid Funds, at this time, had been encumbered or dedicated elsewhere. He <br /> 37 suggested that, when funds become available, the City begin to accrue money toward additional <br /> 38 improvements. He stated that the funds would be coming back in smaller amounts, however. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Councilmember Thuesen stated that, in the future, the City should continue to concentrate on this <br /> 41 issue and prioritize lighting for security. Mayor Hodson suggested that information and <br /> 42 suggestions could be released in upcoming newsletters. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Mr. Hubmer stated that fees would be based on the costs of maintenance. He suggested that <br /> 45 street utility funds could be used for decorative lighting and increased electrical costs. <br /> 46 <br />