My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03151988
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1988
>
PL PACKET 03151988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:37:14 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:36:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1988
SP Name
PL PACKET 03151988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C 2 TY O F S T . ANTHONY <br /> HO U S 2 N G AND REDEVELOPMENT <br /> AUTHOR 2 TY M 2 NUT E S <br /> FEBRUARY 2 4 1. 9 8 8 <br /> 1 The meeting was called to order at 10 : 15 P.M. by Chair Sundland. <br /> 2 Present for roll call: Sundland, Vice Chair Enrooth, Secretary/ <br /> 3 Treasurer Marks, and Commissioners Makowske <br /> 4 and Ranallo. <br /> 5 Also present: David Childs , Executive Director <br /> 6 William Soth, H.R.A. Attorney <br /> 7 FEBRUARY 9 , 1988 H.R.A. MINUTES <br /> 8 Motion by Marks, seconded by Ranallo to approve as presented. <br /> 9 Motion carried unanimously.. <br /> 10 CLAIMS <br /> 1 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $2 ,294. 29 <br /> 2 to the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services to the H.R.A. <br /> 13 during October, 1987. <br /> 14 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 15 STAFF UPDATE ON KENZIE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT - CHILDS AND SOTH <br /> 16 After Staff ' s meeting with the H.R.A. February 9th, staff met with <br /> 17 both Gaughan and Lang/Nelson and indicated the City wanted $20 ,000 now <br /> 18 and $20 ,000 in 30 days for an additional 15 days which would not be <br /> 19 applied to the purchase price for the land.- There was no interest on <br /> 20 the part of either developer to that proposal. <br /> 21 Conversation that day with Gaughan indicated their willingness to put <br /> 22 up $20 ,000 for 45 days with the amount to apply to the purchase price. <br /> 23 Staff is waiting fora final response from Lang/Nelson, Monday because <br /> 24 their representative reported his boss' first reaction had been that <br /> 25 the City was in effect, "raising the purchase price by $40 ,000 . " <br /> 26 Staff ' s response had been to tell Lang/Nelson that the intent had not <br /> 27 been to raise the price of the land but that the H.R.A. was only <br /> 28 looking for security to assure project development and if that <br /> 29 happened, there was no reason the money couldn' t be applied to the <br /> 30 purchase price. Mr. Childs added that because Lang/Nelson doesn' t <br /> �31 have an exclusive on the project, they ,are unable to proceed at this <br /> 32 point anyway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.