My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 07152003
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2003
>
PL PACKET 07152003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:43:29 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 07152003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2—Amcon Construction/Stonehouse Redevelopment <br /> The other conditional use permit is for the on-sale liquor store, which is also a permitted <br /> conditional use in a commercial zoning district. Again, conditions can be placed on the <br /> store, depending on what is appropriate. <br /> Two front yard setback variances are being requested. The variance request consists of <br /> two front yard setback variances of 30 feet each for a proposed setback of 5 feet at the <br /> building corners. Due to the triangular shape of the parcel, the natural tendency is to <br /> develop the site similar to its current layout with the building to the south side and a sea <br /> of parking out to the corner. One of the strengths of the design concept, according to <br /> the developer, is to reduce the impact of the parking lot and to reinforce the street edge <br /> by using the restaurant to wrap around and create a.corner. This keeps the parking <br /> central within the site to allow shared use of the parking due to the shifting peak times of <br /> the businesses. Amcon has stated they will make an attractive gateway at the "front <br /> yard" entrance to the development. <br /> One rear yard setback variance of 10 feet is being requested for a proposed setback of <br /> 10 feet at the southeast corner property line jog. According to the developer, due to a <br /> job in the property line at the southeast corner of the site, the rear yard setback is <br /> greatly reduced (by approximately 35 feet). The triangular shape of the site creates a <br /> natural siting of the retail, building to the south property line. This property line jog <br /> reduces a comfortable building to property line dimension from 45' to 10'. <br /> The final variance request from Amcon is related to parking. The developer is <br /> requesting a parking variance of 40 stalls for a proposed 40 parking stalls for a sit-down <br /> restaurant. The developer says the proposed parking assumes a lower total requirement <br /> than the City code requires. City code states the amount of parking needed must be no <br /> less than the total seating capacity of the structure divided by 2.5, plus one parking <br /> space for each employee on the largest shift. The proposed restaurant will have 170 <br /> seats. Based on the City's required parking formula, the required number of stalls would <br /> total 80. The developer is proposing 40 stalls for the restaurant with the balance to be <br /> shared with the retail building. Regarding the retail component, there must be at least <br /> one parking space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area, which is 20,000 square <br /> feet in this case. The developer shows 67 parking stalls for the retail area, which meets <br /> city code. Due to staggered peak business times for retail/liquor store and the <br /> restaurant, the centralized parking will maximize the efficiency of the development, <br /> according to the developer. There is a commercial shopping center to the south of the <br /> site. The owner of the St. Anthony Shopping Center has stated to staff that he does not <br /> want to be the spillover parking spot, which is a concern. <br /> In the past, staff has conducted research on parking requirements in neighboring cities. <br /> Attached please find the memo summarizing area parking requirements. <br /> In terms of signage, the developer has told staff they will keep within the limits of the <br /> City's sign ordinance. It will all be building/wall signage. The developer has mentioned <br /> that the wall signage will consist of backlit logo signs. There will not be a glow to affect <br /> the residential area. The developer has mentioned the same goes for the lighting on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.