My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08091983
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1983
>
CC PACKET 08091983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:51:46 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:51:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 08091983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-6- <br /> Councilman Ranallo commented that he had observed that large committees <br /> rarely accomplish anything and suggested two or three persons re- • <br /> presenting each side might result in a more effective negotiation. <br /> Councilman Enrooth suggested a mediator service might be utilized. <br /> There was general agreement that Mr. Childs ' workload is too heavy for <br /> him to undertake the task of acting as mediator and secretary in this <br /> problem. <br /> Erling Weiberg, who lives at 3409 - 36th Avenue N.E. , the street just <br /> behind the church property , reiterated that he had served as spokes- <br /> person for both the six families on 36th, whose property would be most <br /> affected by the proposed addition, and the 23 persons in that neighbor- <br /> hood who had signed the petition of opposition to its construction in <br /> the location proposed. Because the notice of the July - 19th hearing <br /> had -not specifically stated where the church expansion would be made, <br /> and', believing the addition would be made to the north, as had been <br /> assumed by the •neighbors over the years , Mr. Weiberg said he And his <br /> wife came to the hearing fully expecting to support the church' s <br /> request. However, when they learned the addition would instead be <br /> built directly behind two of the neighbors , who vehemently opposed <br /> its construction, Mr. and Mrs . Weiberg concluded they had no choice <br /> but to support their neighbors . When the Planning Commission tabled <br /> their recommendation on the church proposal to give the church an <br /> opportunity of coming up with a more acceptable plan , the neighbors <br /> came to the August 4th meeting with the church officials anticipating <br /> that would be the case, according to Mr. Weiberg. Instead, he said, <br /> the church officials indicated they could not change their plans and- <br /> the only suggestions for other ways of constructing the addition came <br /> from the neighbors themselves , and all those were rejected by Mr. Jones* <br /> at the August 16th Commission hearing. The fact that one resident <br /> had expressed opposition to one of these suggestions was certainly <br /> not representative ofthe whole neighborhood, Mr. Weiberg said. <br /> Because there had been complaints about the church ' s maintenance of <br /> their property in the past, and in order that these problems should not <br /> become a source of major disagreements between the church and the <br /> neighbors , or issues in which the City would have to be involved, as <br /> this one had, the spokesperson suggested the establishment of a neighbor- <br /> hood committee which could meet on a yearly basis with church officials <br /> to work out any problems regarding weed control , snow removal, etc. <br /> which might come up during the year. When Mayor Sundland asked <br /> Mr. Weiberg if he believed it would be possible for the neighbors to <br /> come up with an alternative to the church ' s proposal which would be <br /> satisfactory to both parties , the spokesperson responded that he <br /> -believes , "it should be up to the church to develop a plan which the <br /> residents could live with" . <br /> Reverend Valtinson then asked what assurances the church would have <br /> that, if a plan could be agreed upon- by both. the church and neighbors , <br /> -it would be given City approval. Councilman Enrooth told him he is <br /> certain any plan which had the. tacit approval of the neighbors would <br /> have: -rio. :problem getting the approval of both the Planning. Commission <br /> 'and the Council. • <br /> Councilman Marks told the church representatives he is concerned that <br /> any decision by the Council that evening would surely interrupt the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.