My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 03101987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1987
>
CC PACKET 03101987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:03:29 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:03:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 03101987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-16- <br /> The Mayor said he sensed Mr. Misiak had been mostly concerned. about the <br /> police enforcing the Ordinance too strictly. Councilmember Marks said <br /> that might- be possible with so many new young policemen on the force who <br /> might want to increase their productivity in this area the same as they <br /> have tagging speeders on Silver Lake Road. <br /> When Councilmember Enrooth said he thought there might be no more than <br /> six or seven people in the Village whose performance made this Ordinance <br /> a necessity for dealing with them, Councilmember Ranallo said he thought <br /> that estimate might be too low. <br /> Mr. . Misiak said he thought there were a lot of people in St. Anthony who <br /> were not even aware the Council was still working on the Ordinance <br /> because the only notice they had received had come several days after the <br /> Planning Commission hearing was held. <br /> Mayor Sundland agreed the Council was "going to have a hard time living <br /> that down" , but assured the homeowner an honest attempt had been made to <br /> invite the residents to give the Council the benefit of their comments at <br /> the Commission' s public hearing which had been thwarted by a computer <br /> breakdown. However, he pointed out, the Council' s apologies had been <br /> expressed through the news articles which Mr. Misiak said he had read and <br /> the Council had been trying ever since to erase the impression that thei, <br /> were "trying to jam this Ordinance down the residents' throat. " <br /> Mayor Sundland said evidently a few people had learned about the hearing <br /> because there had been some residents present to give the Commissioner' s <br /> their opinions of what should be done. And, he said, he had gotten a <br /> number of calls about the issue since that time, most of which were in <br /> favor of the changes. He had discounted one letter he had received <br /> against the proposal because it had not been signed, the Mayor said. <br /> The Mayor said he could see some real merit in Councilmember Makowske' s <br /> suggestion that the number of vehicles not be specified in the Ordinance <br /> but that parking be restricted to paved or graveled surfaces. He said he <br /> also agreed with her that it would be better to have a less restrictive <br /> law written at this time which could be tightened up later, if necessary. <br /> Additional comments were: <br /> Makowske -told Mr. Misiak the public hearing before the Planning . <br /> Commission had only been the start of the process and the <br /> Ordinance still had to be given three readings before it <br /> would be adopted, which should leave enough time for further <br /> resident input. <br /> Ranallo -said he was concerned that- only those who were against the <br /> Ordinance were being heard now because none of the people <br /> who had called him in favor of the restrictions were prese <br /> to reiterate that support. However, he also perceived the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.