My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 03101987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1987
>
CC PACKET 03101987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:03:29 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:03:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 03101987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-17- <br /> were -issues •in the .Ordinance as it now stood which might. <br /> need changing. <br /> Makowske agreed that St. Anthony residents make good use of their.. <br /> backyards - and wouldn' t b,e too happy to have the "eyesores <br /> " pushed from the front to the backyards.. " <br /> Soth suggested the Council -might want to amend the wording to <br /> indicate that "all vehicles parked on any City lot shall <br /> be. parked on surfaced pavement or a defined gravel drive- <br /> - way in the front yard. " <br /> Enrooth -perceived that might solve the problem .-of- "people just <br /> throwing gravel around their backyards" , but <br /> -questioned how much control the. Council really wanted to <br /> - exercise in this regard.- <br /> Sundland -reported that he, like Councilmember Ranallo, had gotten <br /> a good number of calls expressing ,a desire that the City <br /> cut down on the number of vehicles parked on residential <br /> • property but perceived most of the callers had not appeared <br /> to be objecting to families like the Misiak' s, whose cars <br /> are used on a regular basis. <br /> Ranallo -agreed with Mr.- Misiak that it had been unfortunate - that <br /> the .residents had learned about the public hearing on <br /> the-se- changes too late to. attend-.the• Commission meeting; <br /> indicated he perceived there was no real- pressure to get <br /> the ordinance passed right away -since the City had lived <br /> with the existing Ordinance for -over twenty-five years, and <br /> "another two weeks can' t make that much difference" ; <br /> suggested that it might be better -to start :-the process all <br /> over by. rewriting the Ordinance and notifying the residents <br /> that ''this is the Ordinance the .Council .is considering pass- <br /> ing. <br /> -said -that would give . everybody, including. the ..people who <br /> :' favor.. more restrictions an opportunity of being heard. <br /> Enrooth indicated he would just as soon- see _the next reading <br /> delayed until 'after the .next. water bill goes out' or a <br /> special.mailing can be sent to •the residents.- <br /> Sundland saw'• no urgency to get the Ordinance --passed; <br /> pointed.-out - that 'he perceived the law making :process was <br /> working just as intended by statute with the Council first <br /> putting together an- ordinance; taking it apart in -response <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.