Laserfiche WebLink
ST. ANTHONY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY <br /> APRIL 10, 1990 MEETING <br /> • 1 1 . CALL TO ORDER <br /> 2 <br /> 3 The meeting of the St. Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority was <br /> 4 called to order by Commissioner Enrooth. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 2. ROLL CALL <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Present : Commissioners Ranallo, Marks, Makowske, Enrooth <br /> 9 Absent: Commissioner Sundland <br /> 10 <br /> 11 3. APPROVAL OF .JANUARY 23, 1990 H.R.A. MINUTES <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Motion by Ranallo, second by Marks to approve the minutes of the January <br /> 14 23, 1990 meeting of the St. Anthony Housing and Redevelopment Authority. <br /> 15 <br /> 15 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 17 <br /> 18 4.- CLAIMS <br /> 19 <br /> 20 A. Dorsey b Whitney <br /> 21 Motion by Ranallo, second by Makowske to approve payment in the amount of <br /> ,22 $1 ,966.95 to Dorsey & Whitney for services rendered from December 1 , 1989 <br /> �3 through December 31 , 1989 for the Evergreen Development Corporation Town- <br /> 24 houses and the Lang-Nelson Project. <br /> • �5 <br /> 26 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 27 <br /> 28 B. Dorsey & Whitney <br /> �9 Motion by Ranallo, second by Makowske to approve payment in the amount of <br /> 30 $197.87 to Dorsey & Whitney for services rendered from January 1 , 1990 <br /> 31 through January 31 , 1990 for the Lang-Nelson Project. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 34 <br /> 35 <br /> C. Dorsey 6 Whitney <br /> 36 Motion by Ranallo, second by Makowske to approve payment in the amount of <br /> 37 $456.25 for. services rendered from February 1 , 1,990 through February 28, <br /> 38 1990 for the Lang-Nelson Project. <br /> 39 <br /> 39 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 41 <br /> 42 5. LANEL - REQUEST FOR SURPLUS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FUNDS <br /> 43 The City Manager explained the request noting that the taxes due on the <br /> 44 individual units in the Autumn Woods development are still well below <br /> 45 the $1 ,200 per unit figure used as a benchmark for considering the return <br /> 46 of surplus tax increment funds. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Councilmember Enrooth had understood previously this matter would be brought <br /> 49 back to the Council only if the taxes on the development exceeded $60,000. <br /> • 50 This has not been the case as the taxes in 1988 were $60,028.64 and. in 1989 <br />