My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01141992
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1992
>
CC PACKET 01141992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:14:39 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:14:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 01141992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING • <br /> 2 DECEMBER 10, 1991 <br /> 3 PAGE 6 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 lettering and above the two Herberger's signs of the same <br /> 7 size; that the application meets the three tests <br /> 8 established by Minnesota Statute and that no one appeared <br /> 9 at the public hearing held by the Planning Commission or <br /> 10 contacted staff before the hearing to speak against the <br /> 11 variance. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 2. Comprehensive Sign Plan - Stop-H-Shop Superette, 3813 <br /> 17 Stinson Boulevard <br /> 18 The applicants originally proposed an eight foot by ten <br /> 19 foot main sign and a four foot by four foot price and <br /> 20 gasoline brand sign. They brought this proposal to the <br /> 21 Planning Commission who advised them to modify the size <br /> 22 of the signs and return with their revised plan. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 They are now requesting permission to erect one pylon <br /> 25 sign to identify the gasoline brand which will be located • <br /> 26 along 3813 Stinson Boulevard and requires variances for <br /> 27 size, number of signs and ground clearance height. Also <br /> 28 included in the comprehensive sign plan is a monument <br /> 29 sign, ingress/egress signs, and building signage. It was <br /> 30 noted that the only reason for the monument sign was to <br /> 31 let passersby know what businesses were there. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Staff advised that the Council could take action on <br /> 34 Detail "A" as submitted by the applicant but could not <br /> 35 act on Detail "B" as this strip mall does not meet the <br /> 36 square footage requirement of the City ordinance which <br /> 37 defines a shopping mall. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 In 1989, the City Council adopted a new definition under <br /> 40 which this 7, 700 square foot building could not qualify <br /> 41 as a shopping center as the City ordinance sets a minimum <br /> 42 requirement of 18, 000 square feet. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Members of the Planning Commission have recommended that <br /> 45 the City Council address in the new Sign Ordinance <br /> 46 shopping centers smaller than 18, 000 square feet which <br /> 47 are not addressed in the draft ordinance presently being <br /> 48 reviewed. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Commissioner Faust felt this figure of 18, 000 square feet <br /> 51 had no particular reason behind it but was an arbitrary • <br /> 52 figure. Councilmember Wagner recalled it had been <br /> 53 selected to accommodate an existing mall. <br /> 54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.