Laserfiche WebLink
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes <br /> August 13, 1996 <br /> Page 4 - • <br /> 1 There was Council consensus to discuss this issue at the next work session. Mr. <br /> 2 O'Brien acknowledged that there was time in the construction schedule to <br /> 3 postpone a decision on this item. <br /> 4 D. Scoreboard. <br /> 5 Mr. O'Brien stated he had reviewed the information regarding alternate <br /> 6 scoreboards received from City Manager. He noted the alternative <br /> 7 scoreboard would work but was of a lesser quality than the proposed <br /> 8 scoreboard. He also noted the major cost of the scoreboard was the <br /> 9 installation. <br /> 10 Ms. Hermann noted there was very little difference in price between the <br /> 11 two scoreboards. The lower priced scoreboard had only a two year <br /> 12 warranty compared to a five year warranty and was a mail order item, so <br /> 13 there would not be local service available. Ms. Hermann stated the total <br /> 14 cost of the proposed scoreboard and installation was $6,061.00. <br /> 15 Wagner noted the proposed scoreboard included a cage and the improved <br /> 16 display. He noted the parties funding the scoreboard were willing to pay <br /> 17 for the proposed scoreboard: <br /> 18 Motion by Enrooth, second by Faust to approve the proposed scoreboard <br /> 19 in an amount not to exceed$6,061.00. <br /> 20 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 21 E. Graus's Price to Connect Exercise Room To Shower Area. <br /> 22 Mr. O'Brien noted there originally had not been much interest in this item <br /> 23 but a final price had been received form Gratis of$7,963.00. <br /> 24 Momson noted the shower area was intended to be for police use only and <br /> 25 - not open to the other public work employees. <br /> 26 There was Council consensus not to proceed with this item. <br /> 27 F. Discuss Asbestos Abatement Consultants' Proposals. <br /> 28 Mr. O'Brien explained two bids had been received to.write the <br /> 29 specifications for demolition of the hazardous material in the current City <br /> 30 Hall building. <br /> 31 Ms. Hermann reported IEA had provided a bid to write the specifications <br /> 32 for$800.00 and provide project management for$18,000.00 to • <br /> 33 $22,000.00. She explained project management included overseeing the <br />