Laserfiche WebLink
35 <br /> The sign drawing submitted by the applicant does show landscaping; however, it is <br /> limited given the pedestal and overall sign size. <br /> This issue goes back to earlier in the year, when Lawrence Sign Company approached <br /> the City on behalf of the Park, about the proposed signage. At that time, city staff <br /> explained that the proposed sign did not meet the city code and rejected it. After that, <br /> they attempted to submit the same sign repeatedly and were denied. In June, city staff <br /> received an incomplete sign variance application and asked the applicant for more <br /> information. Staff has since gone back and forth with the applicant, with information still <br /> incomplete. All along, the applicant has expected and leaned heavily on the City to fill <br /> out the variance application for them. <br /> City staff has indicated, as presented, that the proposed ground sign is not acceptable. <br /> The applicant wanted the request to come forward through the city process, as is, to see <br /> what the response would be to the variance requests. <br /> Attachments: <br /> • Petition for Variance <br /> • Map <br /> • Proposed Sign Drawing <br />