My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 11151988
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1983
>
PL PACKET 11151988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2017 12:07:20 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:29:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1983
SP Name
PL PACKET 01181983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
*consideration of security for the ponding areas as well as a walking <br /> path around the site perimeters; <br /> *provision of a walkway to the shopping center areas; <br /> *provision of access to the site for emergency vehicles. <br /> Notion carried unanimously <br /> commission Recommends New Restaurant Sig sage Proposal <br /> At 8:15 P.M. the Chair read aloud the Notice of the Hearing on the <br /> request from Thomas J. Aulwes, owner of TA's Family Restaurant, 2905 <br /> Kenzie Terrace, for a variance from the City Sign Ordinance regulations <br /> to allow a second wall sign on the east wall of his restaurant. The <br /> notice had been published in the August 3rd Bulletin and sent to all <br /> property owners of record within 200 feet of the subject property. No <br /> one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to its <br /> content. <br /> Proposal <br /> *to erect two signs of 56 square feet each, for 'a total of 112 square <br /> feet of signage where the Ordinance would allow one sign of 100 square <br /> feet; <br /> *to remove the roof sign which has been grandfathered from past <br /> owners. • <br /> Staff Report <br /> Childs reiterated information in his August 12th memorandum, <br /> including his recommendation that the variance be granted because: <br /> a. the restaurant has three street frontages and the City has <br /> previously granted variances for second signs on corner lots; <br /> b. - the exchange of a smaller wall sign for the removal of the <br /> controversial roof sign would remove some of the problems <br /> . caused by the non-conforming signage the previous restaurant <br /> owner put up before the Commission could act on his request; <br /> C. the applicant had already removed some of that signage from <br /> the building but had waited for City approval to finish what <br /> appears would be a more tasteful sign on the building; <br /> d. staff knows -of no connection between the applicant and either <br /> of the previous owners; <br /> e. no calls or letters opposing the variance have been received <br /> at this time. <br /> 7 , • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.