My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 10181988
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1988
>
PL PACKET 10181988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:38:26 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:38:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1988
SP Name
PL PACKET 10181988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 *perceived most of that approval was based on Dr. Osterbauer's <br /> 2 operation continuing and she thought if the business were to change, <br /> 3 they would all be voicing the same kind of concerns some of the o <br /> 4 Commissioners had related to the type of business which was going in <br /> 5 their neighborhood; <br /> 6 *continued to think that even though the Ordinance might somewhat <br /> 7 restrict the type of business which could operate from that location, <br /> 8 she still perceived there was a chance of the "whole texture of .the <br /> 9 business changing drastically" ; <br /> 10 *wondered if the next business owner who might not be a resident, as <br /> it Dr. Osterbauer is, would be as interested in maintaining a "residential <br /> 12 look for the building" ; <br /> 13 *didn't think the Ordinance provided any guarantees or safeguards for <br /> 14 the neighbors who had recently moved into that residential neighborhood <br /> 15 that the area would retain a residential character; <br /> 16 *thought it was the responsibility of the Commission to provide those <br /> 17 safeguards. <br /> 18 London <br /> 19 *at first had said he was really "straddling the fence" on the issue <br /> 20 and indicated he basically agreed with Commissioners Madden and Wagner <br /> 21 that the "B" zoning is such that it only allowed businesses like <br /> 22 engineering, legal , etc. services which are the types of services which o <br /> 23 require only one or two people to run the office; <br /> 24 *perceived the types of services which would be allowed were not the <br /> 25 types of businesses with large volumes of people or traffic; <br /> 26 *said -he wouldn't expect to see a large increase in traffic from any <br /> 27 type of business which went in there after Dr. Osterbauer and perceived <br /> 28 any of those services would fit in well , - with the rest of the <br /> 29 neighborhood. <br /> 30 Franzese <br /> 31 *perceived the Commission wanted to accommodate Dr. Osterbauer who <br /> 32 had been "a good businessman and resident of St. Anthony" for so many <br /> 33 years, but questioned whether the City had the same obligation to the <br /> 34 next businessmen whether they're attorneys, realtors, or accountants, <br /> 35 who want to open an office in that neighborhood when there are plenty <br /> 36 of other office spaces available in other St. Anthony locations. <br /> 37 Childs said he had forgotten to tell the Commissioners that should Dr. <br /> 38 Osterbauer leave that location, its non-conforming status could always <br /> 39 be transferred to another dental office because the use does go with the <br /> 40 land and not the owner. However, if the building is destroyed, the <br /> 8 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.