PL PACKET 10181988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I property can only be rebuilt as a single family residence without the •2 City rezoning it. 3 When Commissioner London commented that he perceived there were really 4 no strong reasons to either grant or deny the request, Commissioner 5 Franzese disagreed, saying she perceived the Commission had a 6 responsibility to protect the residential character of the neighborhood. 7 Commissioner Werenicz said -he perceived this was "a drastic step" 8 because to him going to anything less than an 11R-1" would be "down 9 zoning which requires some strong arguments for changing" , which, he 10 added, he had not heard that evening. He didn't think admiration for it the dentist was a good justification for rezoning. He agreed with 12 Commissioner Madden's observation that the "whole City couldn't be R-1" 13 but perceived that was not really the issue because the zoning of this 14 property was 11R-1" now. 15 Commission Recommendation 16 Motion by Madden, seconded by Wagner to recommend the Council grant the 17 request from Robert F. Osterbauer for a change in zoning classification 18 from R-1 (single family residential) to B (service/office limited 19 business) for the property at 2525 - 33rd Avenue N.E. and described as 20 Tract E, Registered Land Survey 211 . In making this recommendation, the 21 Planning Commission finds that: 22 1. The usage of the property can't really be changecelin the future 23 because the Ordinance requires it to remain service oriented and not &4 commercial. 25 2 . The City's 1981 Comprehensive Plan classified this location as a B 26 (service/office) zone which was developed by prior governmental bodies 27 after much study and consideration. 28 3 . Many of the neighbors apparently are in favor of a zoning change and 29 two of them indicated their approval in writing, while only,�Wc's�po e 30 against the zoning change at the hearing. 31 Voting on the motion: 32 Aye: Madden, Wagner. Cti 33 Nay: Franzese, Werenicz , Brownell , London. 34 Abstention: Hansen. 35 Motion not carried. 36 No Problems Perceived From Allowing More Amusement Devices in the 37 Bonaventura Malt Shop at Apache 38 At 8: 34 P.M. the Chair opened the public hearing on the request from 39 the proprietor of the above business to amend the Conditional Use Permit • 9