My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 10211997
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1997
>
PL PACKET 10211997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:34:45 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:34:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1997
SP Name
PL PACKET 10211997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-TUN — 7 — 9 5 WED 1 2 : 3 8 H I L L S G I L P E R T S O " P . 02 <br /> Iffis <br /> Formell&Associates Architects 104 H1,Franklin Ave.Minneapolis MN 55404 61 2/870-1000 FAX612/870-8441 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Oate: S June 1995 <br /> Re: The Salvation Army Silver Lake Camp <br /> Survey of Existing Buildings <br /> By:Tim O'Brien <br /> Present: Sean McAlpine, Vic Gilbertson, Tim O'Brien <br /> Copy: Mrs. Col. Arnold, Sean McAlpine, Vic Gilbertson, Les Formell <br /> A meeting was held.on 18 May 1995 tor review the condition of three of the existing Silver Lake Camp <br /> Buildings. The following Items were noted: <br /> 1. M Bar 0 Building: <br /> • A. The building appeared to have some structural concerns which were examined, which was <br /> indicated by some portions of the roof which were concave, as well as some bowed portions of the <br /> exterior wall: <br /> 1-The roof trusses In the main hall are constructed of 2 x 6 studs with a spacing that varies <br /> from 6 feet to 8 feet 4 Inches on center (see attached sketch of truss). This truss design <br /> was reviewed with a structural engineer(the Schuett-Meler Company),and their design was <br /> analyzed: ft Is the engineer's conclusion that the trusses are essentially 'self supporting' <br /> with a total load capacity of 10-15 pounds per square foot, far below the 40 pst currently <br /> required by code. The engineers speculated that the reason that the roof is still standing <br /> is that the sheathing on the Interior and exterior of the trusses is providing additional <br /> support. <br /> 2. The floor is supported by a series of jury rigged posts which have no lateral bracing.The <br /> lack of lateral bracing means that under heavy load conditions, the deflection of the floor <br /> could cause the supports to `tip° or slide out, which could result in fallure of the floor <br /> structure. <br /> S. Conclusions; - <br /> Neither the floor or roof structure appear to comply with current code requirements. That the - <br /> structure has not collapsed Is a combined function of luck and the sheathing holding things up it <br /> could also continue to hold up, but In the Interest of public safety Its continued use cannot be <br /> reccommended,especially not when the floor could be heavily loaded Qarge groups)orwhen there <br /> Is any superimposed load (snow) on the roof. <br /> • yti trsoh yxe-Xir*►Q . 5+�� . �j Ti'tnx 6T/- eA 1�1 ��n� 64�' <br /> P 11, � <br /> Q � orC cvn�t,C'SaTio� , <br /> 1 S�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.