Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> • --------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number <br /> ,-0 Resolution <br /> December' 9, 1983 Ordinance Reports-3b <br /> a Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Audit for <br /> Other <br /> s; December 13, 1983 <br /> Calendar Year 1933 <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> TO: Mayor and Councilmen <br /> FROM: David M. Childs City Manager <br /> -------- <br />,; SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: Attached is a letter from Adrian S. Helgeson <br /> Co. who have completed the City s annual audit for the last 3 years. They propose <br /> a fee for the calendar year 1983 Audit of $10,400. This fee includes General Fund, <br /> Liquor Fund, and Water and Sewer, Funds , but excludes the Housing and Redevelopment <br /> Authority. Last year, the audit costs were $9,200 ($3,700 of which was liquor <br /> and $5 ,500 for the remaining funds) . <br /> • <br /> FISCAL IMPACT: We surveyed 6 other cities , three of which were slightly larger <br /> and 3 were slightly smaller. 1982 costs ranged from a high of $25-30 ,000 in Little <br /> Canada to a low of $5 ,500 in Champlin, where the Finance Director does a major <br /> part of the audit. Others surveyed included Arden Hills-$13,585 , Mendota Heights - <br /> $15 ,000, Chaska-S5 ,900 and Prior Lake-$7,000. None of the above cities have munici - <br /> pal liquor included in those costs . Our cost was' $5 ,500 for 1982 and will be <br /> about 56,200 for the upcoming 1983 Audit. <br /> ALTERNATIVES : Approve the Helgeson proposal or rebid the audit. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: He 1 geson ' s reports have been excellent and have received <br /> commen ations rom the State Auditor. The price is in line and I prefer to stay <br /> with a firm at least 5 years without rebidding to allow a firm to become more <br /> familiar with our operation. I recommend approval of the proposal . <br /> • CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: . COMMENTS : <br />