My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 11081983
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1983
>
CC PACKET 11081983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:53:05 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:52:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 11081983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> r <br /> REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION. <br /> 1 • Date Submitted Type o,f Action Requested Agenda Item Number <br /> Resolution <br /> December 9, 1983 Ordinance Unfinished Business-] <br /> Date Action Requested X Formal Action/Motion Title Elmwood Lutheran <br /> Other Church - Conditional Use <br /> December 13, 1983 Permit <br /> r <br /> 4 <br /> 1 <br /> TO: Mayor and Councilmen <br />:k <br /> FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager <br />.r ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> r SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: This is a continuation of the request for a <br /> 3 conditional use permit from Elmwood Church to .construct an addition to the church. <br /> The matter was tabled to allow the church and abutting property owners to try to <br /> resolve their concerns among themselves. It appears from the attached letters and <br /> maps that they have been unable to reach any point of compromise. <br /> • FISCAL IMPACT: <br /> ALTERNATIVES : <br /> 1 . Approve the revised site plan and conditional use for the church with conditions <br /> previously discussed: <br /> a. mitigation of runoff and drainage concerns ; <br /> b. treatment of any new windows to assure privacy of the neighbors. <br /> 2. Deny the request stating the reasons therefor. <br /> 3. Modify the site plan as desired by the Council . <br /> 4. Other actions the Council may deem necessary. <br />' RECOMMENDATION: <br /> r <br /> It had originally been hoped that there would be no win/loss type of situation be- <br /> tween the groups. The site plan changes proposed by the church considerably soften <br /> the impact of the addition. The proposal meets all applicable codes and regula- <br /> tions.- I am unable -to supply any solid recommendations for. denial and* therefore <br /> must recommend approval to protect our legal position. <br /> • CI-TY .MANAGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS : <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.