Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 1 Motion •by ' Enrooth, seconded by Marks to approve payment of $5 , 272 . 67 O <br /> 2 as the .City' s share - of- - costs for work performed by Bruce Liesch <br /> 3 Associates., Inc: through November 4 , :1987, in conjunction with the <br /> 4 City' s lawsuit against the U.S. Army . et al relative to St. Anthony' s <br /> 5 water contamination problems . <br /> 6 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 7 Motion by Marks, seconded by Ranallo to approve payment of $2 , 565 . 69 <br /> 8 to the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services rendered through <br /> 9 October 31 , 1987 with - $1 , 063 . 75 of those costs to be paid from the <br /> 10 Liquor Fund. <br /> 11 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 12 Motion by Marks, , seconded by Su.ndland to approve payment. of $24 , 896 . 98 <br /> 13 to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for December sewer <br /> 14 services. <br /> 15 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 16 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Sundland to approve payment of <br /> 17 $2 , 200 . 00 to -Hance & LeVahn for legal services rendered during <br /> 18 December, 1987 , relative to St. Anthony prosecutions. <br /> 19 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 20 Councilmember Makowske arrived at 7 : 35 P.M. <br /> 21 Contractor ' s Payment Tabled <br /> 22 Copies of BWBR' s estimation of the amount due Fullerton Lumber for the <br /> 23 Stonehouse liquor warehouse project had been distributed by the City <br /> 24 Manager , who indicated there would be about $56 , 000 remaining- on the <br /> 25 contract after the payment of $61 , 078 . <br /> 26 The contractors had been granted a ten day extension, which would <br /> 27 expire December 9th, and had indicated it would be into January before <br /> 28 the project would - be totally completed. Even though the original <br /> 29 deadline was December 1st, had the project been completed by October <br /> 30 1st , as the .contractor had originally said it would, there would have <br /> 31 been time for the City to get the space ready for the holiday season, <br /> 32 Mr. Childs said. He added that there had been some unanticipated <br /> 33 costs for the project, including the architect ' s time and -costs for <br /> 34 extra inspections due to the contractor ' s errors , including improper <br /> 35 pouring of footings, problems with structural steel, etc . <br /> 36 - There is no penalty clause in this contract, Mr . Childs told the <br /> 37 Mayor, and he said he wasn' t certain withholding payment at this time <br /> 38 would do much good since the :. contractor had the option to stop work O <br /> 39 until payment is made. However, he agreed to prepare a complete <br /> 2 <br />