CC PACKET 11131990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Paul G. Brewer • October 24, 1990 Page #2 I believe a chronological order of events justifying the extra services. noted on Invoice No. 8571 would be in order. We began preparation of plans and specifications in late November, 1989. We submitted preliminary plans and traffic control specifications to Mr. Larry Hamer, Director of Public Works, City of St. Anthony, for his review -and approval on December 12, 1989. Final plans and specifications and a copy of the Hennepin County Permit Application were submitted to Mr. Hamer on January 16, 1990. On this same date, the permit application and plans and specifica- tions were submitted to Mr. Dave Zetterstrom of the Hennepin County Highway Division traffic office and Mr. Paul Brewer. We also submitted an engineer's estimate to you on that same date. At the end of January, you questioned the need for the left turn in the median for a future driveway on the north side. On April 16, 1990, we were contacted by Mr. Dave Zetterstrom and informed that the left turn lane for eastbound would be deleted, the westerly median would .be lengthened plus or minus ten feet to the east or to the nearest joint, approximately Station 3+90. We were to remove two driveways on the eastbound Kenzie Terrace south side, Station 5+00 to Station 6+00. We were to -make • revisions on the plans and specifications and resubmit a permit. These revisions are indicated as a part of the extra services on Invoice No. 8571. Additional extra services involved site visits during construction by the project manager to discuss additional requirements imposed by Hennepin County after the existing pavement edge was exposed. I will address these items later. On April 23, 1990, we received a request from Mr. Brewer to switch back from City participation and administration of the project to the participation and administration by La Nei Financial Group, Inc. This required a slight change in the specifications which appears as extra services on Invoice No. 8571. The revised plans were submitted to the City, La Nei Group and Hennepin County on May 10, 1990. In addition, a revised engineer' s estimate was submitted to Mr. Brewer for his infor- mation. SEH followed the as-constructed plans as provided by Hennepin County for design of the revisions to the median section and pavement reconstruction adjacent to the median. The information submitted to SEH by Hennepin County did not indicate any requirement for drilling and placing reinforcement steel in the edge of the existing pavement. After the undersigned met with Mr. Brewer's contractor, Mr. Pete Donino, representing the prime • contractor on the project, it was discovered that the large portion of the existing pavement already had a keyway inplace. We