My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 03221994
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1994
>
CC PACKET 03221994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:28:36 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:28:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 03221994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P011taft <br /> Focus on <br /> - i the Issues <br /> A legislative session update on matters of policy for AMM member city officials <br /> Metropolitan Governance Restraeturing (EEF2276-Orfield; 8F2016-Ryan) <br /> his bill,the result of the Legislative Advisory Council on Metropolitan Governance study of <br /> regional governance,would provide for an elected form of regional government,now known <br /> as the Metropolitan Council.It also would abolish the operating agencies and fold the <br /> departments,their staffs and budgets under direct control of the Metropolitan Council. <br /> The Flynn-Orfield metropolitan governance The AMM, through its Metropolitan <br /> reorganization bill has a few similarities with Governance Task Force, consciously decided <br /> the AMM-supported reorganization bill that the Metropolitan Council itself should <br /> introduced during the 1993 session. The two engage in visioning and planning. By retaining <br /> bills would provide that the executive director be the metropolitan agencies (with Council <br /> hired by and -answerable to the entire budgetary oversight and appointment power), <br /> Metropolitan Council. They also would provide the Council would not be involved in the day-to- <br /> . <br /> that the chair be appointed from among the day operations. This increased authority over <br /> Metropolitan Council members, and that the metropolitan agencies coupled with the <br /> members be elected to the Council recognizing that the Council already has tax and <br /> levy authority lead to the Task Force's <br /> However, many -conflicts exist between the recommendation that the Council be elected. <br /> Flynn-Orfield bill and the AMM-supported <br /> version introduced during the 1993 session. The AMM Board of Directors, after <br /> reviewing the enclosed chart,voted to oppose <br /> Notably, the Flynn-Orfield legislation would HF2276/SF2015 in its present form. The <br /> create a large metropolitan level of government AMM opposes the bill as drafted because it <br /> with about 4,000 employees, would not would effectively make the Council a full <br /> distinguish between metropolitan agency fledged . operating level of government <br /> budgets and would permit the funds to through the elimination of the operating <br /> intermingle. The estimated annual .operating agencies.Their elimination would change the <br /> budget under this proposal would be more than Council's role from a planning agency to an <br /> 5300 million. operating agency.Besides the questions about <br /> the number of employees and the eventual <br /> But the real problem philosophically and in commingling of budgets, the AMM differs <br /> policy is the lack .of separation between big- philosophically and practically on the election <br /> picture planning and daily operations. Also, the and election procedures. Also, <br /> underlying reasoning for direct election of HF2276/SF2015 makes no provision for <br /> council members dovetails between the AMM separating Met Council big-picture planning <br /> proposal and the Flynn-Orfield bill. and day-today operation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.