My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05092000
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000
>
CC PACKET 05092000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:13:49 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:13:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 05092000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
48 <br /> To: St. Anthony City Council <br /> From: St. Anthony Planning Commission <br /> Re:. Recommendation to change lot coverage ordinance. <br /> Background <br /> In the fall of 1999, the Planning Commission heard two very similar variance requests <br /> in consecutive months. They were both requests for variances of the lot coverage <br /> maximum. Both were undersized tats in area and width. 'Both had garages located in <br /> the backyard with the driveway running from the street in front (i.e., no alley). .Both <br /> were above the maximum 35% lot coverage limit with 20-25% of the coverage made <br /> up of the driveway and garage. Both listed the non conforming lot size and width as <br /> the hardship in their variance request. <br /> There.are 439 lots under the current 9000 square foot minimum, about 25% of the city. <br /> We suspect that most, if not all, of these lots are already above the 35% limit and many <br /> will be seeking variances as people seek to enlarge their Rarages or improve their <br /> homes. Rather than looking at the requests on a case by case basis,.the Planning <br /> Commission wants to set criteria that can be applied consistently, allowing <br /> improvement of the homes in St. Anthony wiftut,advemely affecting_the-storm..water <br /> control efforts. The go;l of thg ordinance change is to reduce the number of variance <br /> requests to only thoae�that-r,_epresent extraordinary circumstances. <br /> Recommendatlnn <br /> We recommend that-the Ipt coverage ordinance be cha,nged as follows: <br /> 1. Change Section 1605T Subd. 44(a) Lot Cove--age to clarify the definition of <br /> "impervious surface" W e de.rl-ec-ks-as long as the surface below the dock is <br /> ..not f mpeus. <br /> Lot Coverage. The area of a tot covered by impervious surface. An <br /> impervious surface is any material that substantially reduces or <br /> prevents the Infiltration of storm water into previously.undeveloped <br /> land. Impervious surface shall, iriclude all buildings, driveways <br /> (paved or-gravel),sidewalks and-park.lng�-areas. A surface that.has _ <br /> been compacted or covered with a layer of material so that it.is <br /> highly resistant to-infiltration ley water will be considered impervious. <br /> Impervious surface shall not include decks as Jong as the surface <br /> beneath the deck is hot impervious. <br /> Note: The-definition a.a_deck should_ also..be_changed to ensure that the deck <br /> .itself as-notimpervious. <br /> 2. Change Section 1615.05, Subd. 8 to create a two tier system for lot coverage <br /> limits. Lots with area 9000 square feet or over would retain the 35% limit. Lots <br /> with area less than 9000 square feet would have an increased limit of 40%. <br /> 3. Add a storm water retention plan to the building permit application. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.