My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06252002
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2002
>
CC PACKET 06252002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:57:33 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:57:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 06252002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Saint Anthony <br /> Redevelopment Eligibility Assessments <br /> May 28, 2002 <br /> PURPOSE <br /> Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) was hired by the.City of Saint Anthony, <br /> Minnesota, to survey and evaluate two properties within a proposed Tax Increment <br /> Financing District. The properties are 4000 Silver Lake Road (Exhaust Pros) and 4004 <br /> Silver Lake Road(Hardees). The purpose of our work was to independently ascertain <br /> whether the qualification tests for tax increment eligibility, as required under Minnesota <br /> Statute, could be met. <br /> The findings and conclusions drawn herein are solely for the purpose of tax increment <br /> eligibility and are not intended to be used outside the scope of this assessment. <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> The proposed district consists of 2 property parcels comprised of the following types of <br /> improvements: 2 commercial structures. <br /> EVALUATIONS <br /> Of the two (2)buildings in the proposed district, two (2)building interiors were <br /> evaluated. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Coverage Test—Two (2) of the two (2)properties met the coverage test with a 100% <br /> area coverage. This exceeds the 70% area coverage requirement. <br /> Condition of Buildings Test—One hundred(100) percent of the buildings—2 of 2 <br /> buildings—were found to be "structurally substandard" when considering code <br /> deficiencies and.other deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial <br /> renovation or clearance (see definition of"structurally substandard" as follows). This <br /> exceeds the Condition of Buildings Test whereby over 50% of buildings, not including <br /> outbuildings, must be found"structurally substandard." <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Our surveying and evaluating of the properties within this proposed Redevelopment <br /> District render results that in our professional opinion qualify the district eligible under <br /> the statutory criteria and formulas for Tax Increment Financing District Funding. <br /> SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ATTACHED <br /> Summary report detailing the above findings, including proposed redevelopment area <br /> map(s) <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.