Laserfiche WebLink
' <br /> City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 16 <br /> September 23, 2003 <br /> Page 16 . <br /> 1 limited to the costs of the City consultants, financial analysis of the project and tax increment <br /> 2 plan, redevelopment and TIF district analysis and creation, legal fees, survey and title costs, <br /> 3 environmental review costs, environmental site investigation costs, etc. She noted the <br /> 4 redeveloper would be reimbursed for these costs and costs associated with acquiring and holding <br /> 5 the Apache Plaza property and other overhead as a qualified tax increment cost in an amount <br /> 6 currently estimated to be $2.645 million. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Ms. Kvilvang explained any cost savings by the redeveloper on negotiating the purchase, non- <br /> 9 statutory relocation payments and demolition of the three commercial properties for the Phase lA <br /> 10 for-sale housing component would be used to first cover any overruns in any other redeveloper <br /> 11 category and 50% of the remainder would be paid to the redeveloper and 50%made available to <br /> 12 the City and HRA for other public redevelopment costs. She noted the incentive fee would not <br /> 13 be payable to the redeveloper if they were in default under the Redevelopment Contract. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Ms. Kvilvang stated the City and HRA would provide the redeveloper with the$586,000 grant it <br /> 16 received from the Metropolitan Council for asbestos abatement at Apache Plaza. She added the <br /> 17 City and HRA would use its best efforts to obtain LCDA and tax-base revitalization grant <br /> 18 funding, in addition to any other available funding from Metropolitan, State and Federal <br /> 19 Sources. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Ms. Kvilvang indicated the master redeveloper would be paid a$1 million fee for the Phase I <br /> 22 development at the time of the closing of the land sale to each project element. She noted the <br /> 23 timing and conditions attached to payment of the fee. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Ms. Kvilvang explained the redeveloper may create and assign its development rights and the <br /> 26 right to enter into the Redevelopment Contract to a single-purpose entity to undertake the <br /> 27 project, without the consent of the City and HRA,provided Len Pratt and John Ordway continue <br /> 28 to hold a majority voting interest in the new entity. She added the redeveloper might thereafter <br /> 29 assign portions of the rights and obligations under the Redevelopment Contract to the <br /> 30 commercial,rental and for-sale developers, with the consent of the City and HRA,which would <br /> 31 not be unreasonably withheld. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Councilmember Sparks stated it was important to remind residents this information had been <br /> 34 given multiple times. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Ms. Kvilvang anticipated the Development Agreement would be brought to Council sometime in <br /> 37 October and noted it may require a special meeting. She added this was a great development for <br /> 38 the City, as it was physically prudent and met the overall redevelopment goals of the City. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Mayor Hodson noted this had been a partnership between residents, Council, development team, <br /> 41 staff, consultants and experts. He added everyone had worked well together to make this <br /> 42 happen. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Motion by Councilmember Horst to adopt Resolution 03-085 relating to the redevelopment of <br /> 45 property in Redevelopment Project Area No. 3 and authorizing the preparation, execution and <br /> 46 delivery of a contract for private redevelopment thereof. <br /> 47 <br />