My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10142003
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2003
>
CC PACKET 10142003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:58:17 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 10142003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> September 23, 2003 <br /> Page 17 <br /> 1 Discussion: <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Councilmember Faust noted it had been a long process to get to this point. He stated it had been <br /> 4 tedious and detail oriented; however, he felt the City had a good financial package and the <br /> 5 developers felt the situation was a win/win for them and the community. He added not many <br /> 6 redevelopments of this size happened in communities the size of St. Anthony Village. He <br /> 7 indicated there had been enough due diligence with the developers to be assured the project <br /> 8 would stand the test of time and was reasonable and prudent. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Councilmember Thuesen stated a lot of information had been received over the months and <br /> 11 years and he was comfortable with the results, as there were many knowledgeable people <br /> 12 working toward the same goal. He noted the process had been careful not to financially <br /> 13 compromise residents or future residents. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Mr. Pratt came forward and stated he felt humbled once again that the City had selected him <br /> 18 some 18 months ago. He noted he knew things would need to be solved as the project moved <br /> 19 forward. He indicated he had kept three things in mind: the need to listen to residents and <br /> 20 consultants, the need to keep the resulting quality development in mind and the need to treat <br /> 21 change with respect. Mr. Pratt thanked those involved who had been helpful moving the project <br /> 22 to this point. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 VII. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. <br /> 25 A. Resolution 03-083 re: $585,000 GO Refunding,Bonds Series 2003D, authorizing <br /> 26 issuance, awarding sale, fixing form, etc. <br /> 27 B. Resolution 03-084, re: $1,170,000 Taxable GO Tax Increment Refunding Bonds Series <br /> 28 2003E, authorizing issuance, awarding sale, fixing form, etc. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Mr. Inman stated the City was selling two refunding bonds. He explained these bonds were not <br /> 31 a new money issue and did not create any new obligation but were simply sold for the refunding. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Mr. Inman reviewed the bids received for the $1,170,000 Taxable General Obligation Tax <br /> 34 Increment Refunding Bonds Series 2003E and noted Cronin and Company, Inc., was the lowest <br /> 35 responsible bidder with a true interest rate of 4.4679%. He recommended Cronin and Company, <br /> 36 Inc.,be accepted as the successful bidder. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Motion by Councilmember Faust to adopt Resolution 03-084 approving Cronin and Company, <br /> 39 Inc., as the successful bidder for the $1,170,000 Taxable GO Tax Increment Refunding Bonds <br /> 40 Series 2003E with a true interest rate of 4.4679%. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Mr. Inman reviewed the bids received for the $585,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds <br /> 45 Series 2003D and noted UMB Bank, N.A., Kansas City, Missouri,was the lowest responsible <br /> 46 bidder with a true interest rate of 2.6436%. He recommended UMB Bank, N.A., Kansas City, <br /> 47 Missouri, be accepted as the successful bidder. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.