Laserfiche WebLink
01 <br /> 1 CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> 2 <br /> 3 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING <br /> 4 <br /> 5 MARCH 9, 2004 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 CALL TO ORDER <br /> 8 Chair Hodson called the meeting to order at 8:05 p.m. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 ROLL CALL. <br /> 11 Commissioners present: Chair Hodson; Commissioners Stille, Thuesen, and Faust. <br /> 12 Commissioners absent: Commissioner Horst. <br /> 13 Also present: Executive Director Michael Mornson and City Attorney Jerry <br /> 14 Gilligan. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 I. APPROVAL OF MARCH 9, 2004,H.R.A. AGENDA. <br /> 18 Motion by Commissioner Thuesen, seconded by Commissioner Stille, to approve the March 9, <br /> 19 2004, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 II. CONSENT AGENDA. <br /> 24 Motion by Commissioner Faust, seconded by Commissioner Thuesen, to approve the Consent <br /> 25 Agenda, which consisted of. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 A. H.R.A. Meeting Minutes of January 27, 2004; an d <br /> 28 B. Claims. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Motion carried unanimously, <br /> 31 <br /> 32 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS. <br /> 33 A. Resolution HRA 04-005• re: Consider proposed acquisition of property by exercise of <br /> 34 power of Eminent Domain and Resolution HRA 04-006, re: Condemnation of CUB <br /> 35 parcel. <br /> 36 Chair Hodson opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 City Attorney Gilligan noted both resolutions on the agenda signified the same resolution; <br /> 39 therefore,the HRA only needed to vote on them once. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Mr. Gilligan explained the HRA received a request to authorize the acquisition of the CUB <br /> 42 parcel and certain related property interests under its power of eminent domain pursuant to the <br /> 43 terms of the Silver Lake Redevelopment Agreement. He noted,under Minnesota law, the HRA <br /> 44 needed to hold a public hearing before it could authorize that action. He indicated this action <br /> 45 was requested by the redeveloper in order for it to comply with the requirements of its Purchase <br /> 46 Agreement for the CUB parcel. He noted his memo of March 2, 2004, stated no action would be <br /> 47 taken by the HRA to commence a condemnation proceeding with respect to the CUB parcel <br /> 48 unless direction was given by the developer following the adoption of the resolution. He stated a <br />