Laserfiche WebLink
-7- <br /> • <br /> Silver Lake Road, at..-.'least' . for- the .present, and instead, direct. ,the <br /> applicant to prepare - a final plat ..- and a : grading plan.. which would,be <br /> consistent with the C-i�ty',s requirements and the--neighbors' concerns .about <br /> drainage and -utility. easements -similar to those required, for the. Johnson <br /> and..Hertog subdivisions. " <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Nelson Request ' for Setback Variance for Attached Garage, Etc.. at 3.412 <br /> Roosevelt Street N.E. Approved <br /> application: from Dwayne and `Nancy. Nelson of the_ above address f.or a <br /> variance from the setback regulations of the Zoning <br /> Ordinance to allow construction of an addition to the' .. <br /> south and west sides of the existing single car garage <br /> to within 6 feet of the south property line. <br /> Commission <br /> recommendation: Hansen indicated the Commission minutes h'ad reflected'. <br /> the intent of the Commission to not further delay action <br /> on the request; <br /> said the applicant and his adjoining neighbor had been <br /> • given a month •to settle their differences and the <br /> Commission conclusion had been that it would not be <br /> fair to either party to delay a decision any further;- <br /> indicated the Commission was now recommending Council <br /> approval of the proposed addition. <br /> Proponents: Nancy Nelson and her daughter, Kris, who indicated- their <br /> desire to get on with the project. . <br /> Opponents: no, one was present to speak against the variances.. <br /> Council Action <br /> Motion by Enrooth, seconded by' Marks to grant Dwayne and Nancy Nelson a 4 <br /> foot sideyard setback variance . for ' the 22: foot wide attached. double <br /> garage they propose to construct " on teir property at 3412 Roosevelt <br /> Street-•N.E. on .the condition the gutter 'system is .put in to drain runoff <br /> away from the adjoining property. <br /> In granting, this variance, . ..the Council finds, as. did the Planning <br /> Commission, that: <br /> the City had already given the neighbors a month to compromise their. <br /> differences; <br /> • any further delay would impose an undue - hardship on the applicants ' <br /> plans for construction; <br />