My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02181992
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1992
>
PL PACKET 02181992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2015 8:39:25 AM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:43:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1992
SP Name
PL PACKET 02181992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4, <br /> K1 ~� <br /> Y' <br /> Black <br /> MUIe k <br /> _ `•`4 " e.s q t LVERY UAY <br /> PM 100*PURE GAS0 ° - F I LOW PRICES <br /> suer BLAC� __ QUALITY UOUR ULI GAS <br /> r 'F WON OILS <br /> TVV US lops PURE '. Z'i _ .PURE AST SE Ana <br /> wisacxtcs <br /> Sign clutter is one of the biggest streetscape problems in many communities. In one case(top), clutter on an <br /> individual site is so bad that the building is"obliterated"by its own signage. In another(opposite page),signs <br /> overlap down the strip, making sign copy difficult, if not impossible, to read. <br /> extra freestanding sign if it contains only a logo or the name such noncommercial districts as industrial and agricultural <br /> of a business,with no advertising.Such a regulation creates zones,where barns and warehouses may have large sides not <br /> ridiculous distinctions;for example,it allows Joe's Beer Bar, needed or used for signage related to the businesses located <br /> which happens to have a beer stein as a logo, to deliver a there. Further limitations can be imposed by providing an <br /> message that neighboring Pam's Place, an indentical busi- additional limit on sign size as a percentage of building area, <br /> ness with a classy (but nonrepresentational) logo, cannot thus effectively prohibiting signs on vacant parcels;such va- <br /> place on the same kind of sign.Furthermore,it raises directly cant parcels should be permitted one sign of 20 or so square <br /> the difficulty of explaining,politically and legally,why the feet per tract or parcel in order to permit For Sale or political <br /> Joe's Beer Bar sign is more acceptable to the public than a signs. <br /> Pam's Sells Beer sign of the same size and design. Although such an approach will undoubtedly allow the <br /> Merchants with franchises or auto dealership agreements development of some creative off-premises advertising signs <br /> can often obtain logo signs relatively inexpensively, and (for example,a motel might convince a roadside gas station <br /> they argue that they should be allowed to erect those signs to give the motel half of its sign space as advertising space <br /> separately.Some franchise agreements actually require that to provide directions to the motel),all of the signs so devel- <br /> logo signs be on poles that do not contain other signs. Re- oped will fall within the limitations on sign size,location, <br /> quiring that George Smith,who sells pizza under a franchise, lighting, color, and design specified in the ordinance and <br /> choose between having the Podgorny Pizza logo sign and a thus should be entirely consistent with local aesthetic and <br /> sign saying "George Smith's Pizza Place," when Irene's traffic safety requirements. <br /> Pizzeria is allowed only one freestanding sign,seems entirely <br /> reasonable—however much George may want to have both ENFORCEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION <br /> his name and the franchise logo on poles in front of his busi- Enforcing and administering sign regulations is in some <br /> ness. The special treatment of logo signs is simply not ways more difficult than enforcing and administering zon- <br /> justified. ing regulations.Zoning administration is closely tied to the <br /> building permit process—anyone putting up a building in- <br /> Billboards forms public officials that he or she is doing so by applying <br /> The major objection to billboards is that they are very for a building permit.It is then easy to review the plans for <br /> large signs.Why many communities have stumbled into the the proposed construction to determine whether the building <br /> quagmire of regulating them as off-premises signs instead of will comply with applicable regulations and to track the con- <br /> banning large signs is a mystery. Clearly, the simplest ap- struction for conformance with approved plans. <br /> proach to billboard regulation is to ban large,freestanding In contrast,many types of signs in many communities do <br /> signs. Limiting the percentage of wall area that can be not require permits.Some types of signs that do require per- <br /> devoted to signs and limiting the absolute size of a wall sign mits may be erected by individual property owners or <br /> provides an effective limit on the use of buildings as tenants without complying with a permit process.Although <br /> billboards.Those limitations should be more restrictive in building inspectors are very likely to notice a new building <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.