Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ---- <br /> at W <br /> _ pluip t - <br /> :Pt NEM - <br /> E; i7Ti <br /> - m <br /> U rY' � i� � � .�.`_�v w�,�- '-+icy,• l, <br /> going up without a permit, signs on buildings and some 2. Establish Records.The model ordinance includes a re- <br /> freestanding signs may be added or changed without attract- quirement for a master sign permit in order to keep a <br /> ing the attention of any official.Even when a sign is erected record of what signs are permitted on each zone lot <br /> or installed in substantial compliance with regulations,the and in what locations. Such a record eliminates the <br /> measurements required in many local sign regulations are need to recalculate permissible sign numbers and sign <br /> usually more complex than those required by the zoning areas because those are all reflected on the permit. <br /> regulations for buildings on the same lot. Field administration becomes a matter of comparing <br /> The enforcement problems with signs generally do not in- what is on the site with what is on the permit.In many <br /> volve large signs provided by sign companies.Many com- cases, the differences,such as the addition of an extra <br /> munities license sign contractors and require permits for pole sign or the enlargement of a wall sign,will be ob- <br /> large signs.Like building contractors,most sign contractors vious on initial inspection without the need for <br /> will not work without required permits and have no desire detailed measurements. <br /> to install signs that will violate local regulations.Thus,that <br /> aspect of sign regulation,like zoning,can be self-policing. 3. Hire Adequate Staff. A community that adopts a <br /> The regulation of banners,portable signs,pennants,painted policy of effective regulation of signs should hire ade- <br /> wall signs, and small signs of all kinds can be much more quate staff to do the job.There is some reason to con- <br /> difficult. sider separating that staff from the building inspection <br /> Many communities make sign enforcement even more staff if the latter is often overworked. Any rational <br /> difficult by adopting regulations that are far too complex to department administrator faced with a personnel <br /> be easily enforced. Regulations that impose different size shortage and a decision about whether to inspect <br /> limits on different types of freestanding signs in the same buildings under construction or to conduct random <br /> location require endless measurements.Regulations that tie sign surveys will order his or her staff to inspect the <br /> sign sizes to lot areas and street frontages require additional buildings.Thus,signs may always remain on the"to <br /> measurements and calculations.There is nothing especially be done" list. If one or more inspectors are assigned <br /> complicated about any particular set of measurements or specifically to sign inspection duties,that problem will <br /> calculations—the problem is simply one of having enough be eliminated. <br /> staff to do the job.Regulations based on sign content create Although the enforcement and administration of sign <br /> even more problems of enforcement and administration regulations raises issues different from general zoning en- <br /> because inspectors must monitor sign copy as well as dimen- forcement, it is certainly related to zoning enforcement and <br /> sions and location. administration. Thus, the two should be part of one total <br /> There are three key steps that a community can take to system, even if certain parts(such as inspections)function <br /> make the enforcement and administration of sign regulation separately.' <br /> efficient. <br /> 1. Keep Regulations Simple. Simple regulations are sim- 4.For a general discussion of enforcement of land-use controls,including <br /> sign regulations,see Eric Damian Kelly.Enforcing Zoning and Land-Use <br /> pie to administer.The model ordinance in this report Controls,Planning Advisory Service Report\o.400(Chicago:American <br /> has been drafted with that concept in mind. Planning Association, 1988). <br /> 15 <br />