My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02181992
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1992
>
PL PACKET 02181992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2015 8:39:25 AM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:43:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1992
SP Name
PL PACKET 02181992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 2. Legal Issues in Sign Regulation <br /> Sign regulation,like zoning,is carried out by the govern- It should be noted that sign law varies from state to state <br /> ment under the police power.The police power is the power far more than other aspects of zoning law.Thus,early in the <br /> to regulate and, in some cases,prohibit private activity in process of preparing a new set of sign regulations,planners <br /> order to protect the health,safety,and general welfare of the and public officials should consult with their local govern- <br /> public at large.It is reserved for the individual states by the ment attorney regarding such issues as amortization of non- <br /> Constitution and granted by each state to its various units conforming signs and the aesthetic foundations for <br /> of local government. regulation. <br /> Any regulation based on the police power must advance This chapter includes a discussion of important decisions <br /> some public interest related to the preservation of the public of the U.S. Supreme Court, the lower federal courts, and <br /> health, safety, and general welfare. Thus, a fundamental some state courts. Specifically, the chapter attempts to <br /> issue in any police power case is whether;in fact,the regula- answer the following questions: <br /> tion advances such a public interest.Courts have upheld sign What governmental interests are necessary to sustain sign <br /> regulation under two separate aspects of the police power. <br /> First,because signs may distract drivers,sign regulation has regulation?Is the promotion or protection of an aesthetic <br /> often been upheld as a traffic safety measure.Second,some standard alone sufficient or must other purposes be ad- <br /> court decisions,particularly more recent ones,have relied vanced7 <br /> on the power of a community to maintain or improve its ap- To what extent must a relationship between the regulation <br /> pearance through aesthetic regulations that are related to the and the governmental interest it purports to protect or ad- <br /> general welfare rather than to any particular health or safety vance be shown,and,importantly,who must prove the <br /> issue. relationship? <br /> Sign regulation raises significant constitutional issues. <br /> Because signs are a form of communication, they are pro- In view of the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of <br /> tected under the First Amendment.Because they are a form speech and expression, to what extent may a sign or- <br /> of property,signs are protected from any uncompensated dinance regulate signs based on the content of the sign's <br /> "taking"under the Fifth Amendment.The various and often message? <br /> complex methods by which communities have'tried to To what extent may local governments require modifica- <br /> regulate the use,location,number,message portrayed,size, tion or elimination of signs that do not conform with a <br /> and design of signs has produced a steady-amount of litiga- new sign regulation? <br /> tion in both the state and federal courts. <br /> This chapter presents an overview of the recurring legal What is the permissible extent of regulations concerning <br /> issues in sign regulation.It provides a general background sign structure,size,lighting,materials,and location upon <br /> in sign law for planners and local officials considering the a particular piece of property? <br /> adoption of new sign regulations.It is far from a comprehen- <br /> sive treatment of the subject.s THE GUIDELINES PROVIDED BY <br /> THE U.S.SUPREME COURT <br /> 5.Daniel Mandelker provides a thorough documentation and analysis Signs area form of communication.Thus,the dominant <br /> of sign law in the revised edition of Street Graphics and the Law. A legal issue confronting sign regulation is the guarantee of <br /> penetrating legal analysis of the First Amendment issues in zoning regula- freedom of speech under the First Amendment to the United <br /> tion by Kenneth Pearlman is set forth in"Zoning and the First Amendment," <br /> Urban Lawyer 16(Spring 1984),217.Attorneys representing local govern- States Constitution.On matters involving the Constitution, <br /> ments in the adoption of new sign regulations and/or in litigation would the Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter.This section in- <br /> be well advised to consult these valuable resources. cludes an examination of some important recent decisions <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.