My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05191992
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1992
>
PL PACKET 05191992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:43:44 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:43:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1992
SP Name
PL PACKET 05191992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> APRIL 21 , 1992 <br /> 3 PAGE 15 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Murphy inquired if staff has contacted other cities with <br /> 7 regard to their ordinances for parking of recreational <br /> 8 vehicles and equipment . Burt responded some cities have <br /> 9 a prohibition of parking of commercial vehicles in <br /> 10 residential areas . <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Gondorchin felt the length criteria would be more <br /> 13 effective to write the ordinance revision on . He thinks <br /> 14 the larger units are more irritating. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Werenicz suggested that the Police Department be made <br /> 17 aware of some of the community concerns in this matter <br /> 18 and to concentrate on enforcement . Burt noted that if the <br /> 19 Police Department were responsible for enforcement there <br /> 20 would be the added dimension of better record keeping. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 C . Review of Proposed Revisions to Sian Ordinance <br /> 23 <br /> 24 The proposed revisions to the Sign Ordinance were <br /> 25 distributed at the Planning Commission Meeting. <br /> 26 <br /> The proposed revisions were briefly scanned by members of <br /> 1 the Commission . The document had not been proofread and <br /> 29 there were some paragraphs left out . <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Burt noted that the Management Assistant had added to or <br /> 32 redefined some of the language of the current Sign <br /> 33 Ordinance rather than that drafting an entire new <br /> 34 ordinance. He felt the Commission members should be aware <br /> 35 that the City is expecting some sign requests which may <br /> 36 not have been made in the past . Some examples are for the <br /> 37 CUB Store if the project goes ahead, a movie theater and <br /> 38 monument signs . <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Urbia recommended that a subcommittee be formed from <br /> 41 among members- of the Planning Commission, representatives <br /> 42 of the St . Anthony Chamber of Commerce, business people <br /> 43 in the City, and representatives of the two shopping <br /> 44 malls in the City. He suggested this subcommittee plan to <br /> '45 meet in the next couple of weeks . <br /> -46 <br /> 47 Faust inquired what regulations would have to be <br /> 48 considered regarding this subcommittee to be in <br /> 49 compliance with the Open Meeting Law. It was determined <br /> 50 that it could be served by two or three members of the <br /> 51 Planning Commission . Burt advised that the subcommittee <br /> 52 meetings will be posted in compliance with the Open <br /> 0 4 Meeting Law. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.