Laserfiche WebLink
• Conduct Systematic Evaluations of Policy Implementation (Low = 1; High = 5) <br /> 6. 3.33 How does the Council get feedback on policy implementation and results? <br /> Range: 2 1 4 5 4 4 . <br /> We don't. "Make it so." Reactive Progress <br /> Reports/Reviews <br /> 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> Reasons for high ratings. Reasons for low ratings. <br /> ➢ We don't get tons of reports on what's ➢ We get little meaningful feedback. We need to <br /> happening in all departments. have better(clearer and more frequent) <br /> communication between the Council and Staff. <br /> Things we need to work on. <br /> • Opening up performance. <br /> At times, we tend to get complacent and thus, we get reactive. <br /> • Comments made by Council: <br /> ➢ Regarding what I need from staff, it would be nice to get a 'heads up' informational piece about <br /> what's happening in the City, before I learn it reading the local newspaper. <br /> ➢ What is the best method for knowing what the'problems' are? <br /> Y If someone want's numbers, should we ask them to provide us with them during the Work Sessions <br /> or should we get the information individually? <br /> ➢ We need a tool, to talk as a group, to interact and prioritize issues. <br /> ➢ We don't need weekly or monthly reports on who is using the meeting rooms. <br /> ➢ The yearly summaries need to include feedback on how each Department did in comparison with <br /> other communities—an Overall Executive Summary— 1 to 2 pages in length. <br /> ➢ The Police Reports need to be reformatted including statistics and trends that allow us to get a clear <br /> picture of what's happening so that we can take appropriate action when needed. <br /> • <br /> 9 <br />