My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06221982
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1982
>
CC PACKET 06221982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:47:52 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 06221982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-3- <br /> liquor operation. The May liquor sales and the Fire Department reports <br /> were then accepted as informational as was the April Police Department <br /> report following a discussion of the number and type of police calls <br /> reported and a progress report on the new Crime Watch program .by the <br /> Manager. <br /> The June 3rd memorandum from the Public Works Director in which he <br /> recommended the branch pickup program be . discontinued in 1983 because <br /> of the cost and time involved, was discussed at great length but <br /> action deferred until after the public hearings scheduled for that. <br /> time had been held. <br /> At 8 : 10 P.M. , the Mayor opened the public hearing on the proposed <br /> ordinance amendment to allow body tanning salons as conditionally <br /> permitted uses in the City which had been deferred until after .the <br /> notice of the hearing had been published as required. Consideration <br /> was given to both the .ordinance amendment and the application by Keith <br /> Grewe for a Conditional Use Permit under the ordinance amendment for <br /> the body tanning salon he- had proposed at several previous hearings <br /> to be opened in the lower level of .the Apache Plaza Shopping Center <br /> as soon as he gets the go-ahead from the City. <br /> Ordinance 1982-005 was given its second reading and Councilman Ranallo <br /> indicated he would vote against the ordinance amendment because he <br /> perceives including this type of operation as an approved use for the <br /> City might, in his opinion, "open the door to undesirable businesses <br /> such as saunas and massage parlors" . He indicated to Mr. Grewe that- <br /> even a visit to the St. Louis Park Tan Me salon had not changed his <br /> • mind. The applicant responded that he could not see how there could <br /> be anything in the manner in which other Tan Me salons are operated <br /> which could be a basis for the misconceptions he perceives had held <br /> up hisrequest approval since April. Mr. Grewe assured the Council- <br /> man he intends to operate only a legitimate business in St's Anthony <br /> and .insisted, the very fact that numerous Tan Me salons are being <br /> established with no problems related to approval , throughout the <br /> metropolitan area, should be an indication that only legitimate <br /> services- are being offered by these franchise owners . Further sub- <br /> stantiation of this fact, Mr. Grewe believes , is the fact that the <br /> Highland Park salon is run by a district judge ' s wife. <br /> Councilman Marks believes , since there has been absolutely no testi- <br /> mony offered during any previous hearings on this proposal that this <br /> is anything but a legitimate business , "there could be no way the <br /> Council could keep a legitimate business from operating in the. City" . . <br /> Councilman Enrooth agreed the lack of negative testimony lef", the City <br /> with "no -recourse other than to accept the tanning salon as a legiti- <br /> mate use under the City Ordinance" . <br /> The Mayor indicated he would propose the permit approval be made <br /> subject to "no violation of any law or ordinance taking place in the <br /> salon" , which he believes would give the City the latitude of enforc- <br /> ing any future laws which might be passed by any government agency , <br /> such as the FDA, which perceives a possible hazard .to health or safety <br /> of the clients of such an operation. <br /> No one other than Mr. Grewe appeared to speak for or against the amend- <br /> ment and the Mayor closed the hearing at 8 : 29 P .M. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.