My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12181984
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1984
>
CC PACKET 12181984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:01:33 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:01:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 12181984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br /> The Council::•f.inds,:-'in•.granting these variances, -as did .the Planning Commission, <br /> that: <br /> 1 . Many similar lots..-with smaller frontages, depth, and land area, have been <br /> platted and developed in the same neighborhood; <br /> 2. The- proposed plat would eliminate 50 foot lots which conform to the City <br /> Zoning Ordinance in an. even lesser degree; <br /> 3. The plat would to a large extent eliminate a legal , but non-conforming, use <br /> in this residential area; and <br /> 4. No objections to the proposed platting-were demonstrated at elither hearing on <br /> the request by any of the neighbors who had been notified. <br /> - The Council further finds in regard to the Subdivision Ordinance related to this <br /> r type of project that: <br /> a. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such <br /> that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive <br /> the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; <br /> a b. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a sub- <br /> stantial property right of the petitioner; and <br />•a <br /> P c. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare <br /> or injurious to other property in the territory in- which said propertyis <br /> situated. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> The November 29th staff notes had referred' to the possibility that- Chair Zawislak <br /> s< might not seek reappointment to the Commission and this possibility was discussed <br /> with him at length. Councilman Makowske indicated she was personally sorry to see <br /> a Commission member who had been doing such a good job as Chairman leave that body. <br /> a She told him she perceived the experience he had gained in the last year had made <br /> r <br /> him even more valuable to the City. <br /> Mr. Zawislak responded that he had read the intent of the Council 's setting terms <br /> for the Commission member to be that they wanted to get new blood on that body. <br /> The Mayor disagreed, saying he perceived the Council 's intention for setting terms <br /> had been more of a stability question. <br /> The Commission Chair recalled how hard it had been for him to get on the Commission <br /> and said his intention had been not to prevent another person, who wanted to serve, <br /> from having that opportunity. However, he added he would again apply if no other <br /> applications. were received for the two positions which would be open next year. <br /> Councilman Marks drew on his own experience on the Commission and indicated he <br /> perceived experience on the Commission was very important. He suggested that it <br /> might be necessary to rewrite the position requirements, so the wording wouldn't <br /> discourage first term Commissioners from applying for a second term. Council direction <br /> related_ to the advertising for applicants was deferred until that action came up <br /> • on• the agenda. <br /> E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.