CC PACKET 11081988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

v 3 The Commission representative sent around the copy of the revised plat 2 the developers presented at the Commission hearing and pointed to the 3 second ponding area which they indicated the resiting of the buildings 4 allowed. The Commission's greatest concerns continued to be the 5 provision of a larger sideyard setback as well as vegetation screening 6 between Building #1 and the west property line and screening of the 7 railroad tracks from the project which the developers had assured would 8 be included in the Final Plat. 9 Proponents: 10 Vern Hoium, Evergreen President and Ursula Sheehy, Vice President and 11 marketing person. 12 When Ms. Sheehy indicated the marketing of the units was going very 13 well, Councilmember Ranallo told her that when the developers had moved 14 another -building so close to the unit he had reserved, he had decided 15 not to purchase that residence. 16 Mr. Hoium told Councilmember Makowske the developers planned to use 17 maintenance free vinyl siding on most of the exteriors and the only 18 brick which was planned would be decorative. 19 Councilmember Enrooth commented that he perceived the platting now 20 provided the type of project the. Council had wanted in the first place. Mayor .Sundland agreed, saying he perceived that by extending the street to the southern edge of their project, the developers were leaving open 23 the possibility of expanding the project into the undeveloped lots to 24 the south. 25 Staff Report: 26 A copy of the City Manager's October 10th memorandum to the Planning 27 Commission had been attached to other pieces of documentation which 28 had been provided the Commissioners in their October 19th agenda packet. .29 Mr. Soth suggested the Council plat approval state. that final plat 30 approval would depend upon a signed Redevelopment Agreemeht. 31 Ms. VanderHeyden confirmed that there was no need to reference the 32 location description to St. Anthony and that the notation of Ramsey . 33 County had been checked out as correct by the City Manager. 34 Council Action 35 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Makowske to approve the revised Prelimi- 36 nary Plat dated September 9, 1988, for the 37 unit townhome, project 37 proposed to be constructed by the Evergreen Development Corporation on 38 the parcel legally described as Lots 1, 2, and 3 , Block 4, Mounds View 39 Acres, Ramsey County, MN and Block 2, Mounds View Acres, Ramsey County, �0 MN generally described -as vacant parcel 4.85 acres in size, located east